FEMA recoups millions in improper payments

The Federal Emergency Management Agency has improved its process for recovering improper payments made to disaster assistance applicants, recouping more than $47 million in 2010 from those affected by hurricanes Katrina and Rita, according to a FEMA official.

"We have drastically reduced the error rates for the amount of funds that were improperly disbursed, from 14.5 percent after Hurricane Katrina to less than 3 percent in fiscal 2009," said Elizabeth Zimmerman, deputy associate administrator for FEMA's Office of Response and Recovery, during a Thursday Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs subcommittee hearing.

FEMA published its revised process for recoupment in the March 15 Federal Register. Applicants now have the opportunity to request an oral hearing with the agency, negotiate a repayment plan with FEMA, and request a waiver for all or part of their debt under special circumstances. Zimmerman said FEMA also has improved its notification process, sending a "notice of debt" letter to affected individuals in clearer language, stating the amount of debt and outlining options for repayment. The money ultimately is returned to FEMA's disaster relief fund.

"Let me make it clear, we are not out to vilify disaster victims, or to subject those who have already suffered unimaginably to harsh debt collection efforts," said Senate Disaster Recovery and Intergovernmental Affairs Ad Hoc Subcommittee Chairman Mark Pryor, D-Ark. "In fact, many of the errors we seek to identify were due to mistakes or inefficiencies by federal agencies."

FEMA provides disaster assistance to individuals and families through its Individuals and Households Program. IHP grants cannot exceed $29,900 per individual or household and are usually limited to 18 months. Since hurricanes Katrina and Rita, FEMA has disbursed more than $7 billion in IHP funds; a report from the Homeland Security Department's inspector general found FEMA had distributed $643 million in improper payments among 160,000 applicants after those two disasters, mostly because of human error, or fraud. Governmentwide, improper payments amounted to $125 billion in 2010.

The agency overhauled its recoupment process for improper payments as a result of a 2007 lawsuit. A group of Katrina and Rita disaster applicants sued the agency, claiming FEMA's process for recovering such payments lacked sufficient explanation, was based on vague standards and did not allow applicants to appeal adequately recoupment decisions. FEMA had to halt its recoupment process until August 2009, when the case was dismissed, and while it worked on revising its system.

FEMA has clarified its recoupment process, but many debts still could be difficult to recover, said Matt Jadacki, assistant inspector general for emergency management oversight at Homeland Security.

"Locating recipients and collecting the improper payments from them may be difficult. Most of the debt is several years old, the money has probably been spent, people have moved, and many recipients may be struggling economically," Jadacki noted, adding, "FEMA officials are concerned with the negative publicity restarting the recoupment process will engender." Homeland Security's fiscal 2010 annual financial report estimated FEMA would disburse $186 million in improper payments in fiscal 2010, $163 million in fiscal 2011 and $140 million in fiscal 2012.

"Our efforts to resolve improper payments," Zimmerman said, "must continue to be balanced with the flexibility to swiftly provide disaster assistance to survivors in times of immediate need."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.