House fails to pass PATRIOT Act extension

In an unexpected development, House Republican leaders on Tuesday failed to garner enough support for a bill to renew until December certain controversial sections of the USA PATRIOT Act that would otherwise expire this month. Senate Democrats and Republicans remain divided over whether to change the provisions in the counterterrorism surveillance law to protect civil liberties, or extend them permanently to protect national security. The Republican-controlled House defeated the measure, H.R.514, by 277-148. A two-thirds majority was required for passage under the expedited voting procedure. White House officials said President Obama would not veto the bill. However, the administration would prefer a temporary, three-year extension that would allow Congress to reconsider the measures, while providing federal officials with needed enforcement powers for at least the next several years. The three intelligence-gathering sections set to expire Feb. 28 include permission to execute roving wiretaps of suspects who switch computers or phone numbers to avoid surveillance; to track "lone wolves" -- persons of interest without known links to terrorist organizations; and to obtain records from organizations with a court order. Privacy activists and some lawmakers would like to add judicial oversight provisions to better protect individual rights, but with time running out -- and the Senate contending with three competing versions of the bill -- most observers expect Congress to pass a straight extension. The House bill would continue the three provisions in the law, which originally was enacted in 2001, until Dec. 8. H.R. 514, introduced Jan. 26, is co-sponsored by Reps. James Sensenbrenner Jr., R-Wis.; House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas; and Mike Rogers, R-Mich. "The ongoing threat from al Qaeda and other terrorist groups continues," Smith said on the House floor Tuesday. "To let these provisions expire would leave every American less safe." The GOP members proposed a one-year extension so Congress could consider making the measures permanent in the near future, while ensuring federal officials have the tools they need to fight terrorism. Sensenbrenner on Tuesday said he intended to introduce a permanent extension "soon." Judiciary Ranking Democrat Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., objected to the bill, saying members never had a chance to debate the measure at length, or hold hearings. On Tuesday, Obama officials issued a statement saying, "The administration would strongly prefer enactment of reauthorizing legislation that would extend these authorities until December 2013. This approach would ensure appropriate congressional oversight by maintaining a sunset, but the longer duration provides the necessary certainty and predictability that our nation's intelligence and law enforcement agencies require as they continue to protect our national security. However, the administration does not object to H.R. 514." Last week, Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, postponed a vote on his proposal, S. 193, for a three-year extension that would include more judicial checks, following a request from GOP members. Senate Republicans then introduced legislation, S. 291, that would make the current provisions permanent. Meanwhile, on Feb. 3, committee member Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., split with Leahy to introduce a bill, S. 289, that would fulfill the administration's wishes by enacting a straight, three-year renewal. Leahy then reintroduced his bill as S. 290 to allow a second attempt at a committee vote or direct consideration on the Senate floor, if Democratic leadership is agreeable, congressional aides said. Leahy staffers on Tuesday said, as of now, he plans to try voting on his bill in committee, perhaps next week, after members return from this week's retreat. The office does not know the schedule for next week's floor votes, they added. "It should not take an entire year to pass improvements to these provisions, which we should have adopted last year, and we should not extend this debate into an election year and risk that some will play politics with our national security," Leahy said on Tuesday afternoon in anticipation of House passage. Senate leadership and aides for the minority leader were not immediately available for comment.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.