EPA tops list of pending regulations under review

The week President Obama announced his controversial governmentwide search for outdated or inefficient regulations, the White House online dashboard that tracks pending regulations under review showed that the Environmental Protection Agency is responsible for the lion's share.

Of the 130 final or proposed rules the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs is vetting to determine costs, benefits and alternatives, 34 come from EPA, followed by 20 at Health and Human Services, and 10 at the Labor Department, according to the OIRA site. Fourteen of the 130 are deemed to have "economic significance," meaning they likely would cost industry or other parties $100 million or more per year.

The Office of Management and Budget website highlighted the dashboard alongside documents for Obama's regulatory initiative released Jan. 18. OIRA and the General Services Administration update the dashboard daily.

Though the numbers of regulations under review appear routinely, they take on new significance as debate unfolds over Obama's response to industry's concerns that the current regulatory environment has impeded job creation.

Rosario Palmieri, vice president for regulatory policy at the National Association of Manufacturers, said the administration now must decide what the new executive order means for proposed regulations in the pipeline. "Are some no longer consistent with that order, and should the agencies go back and provide additional backup data?" he said.

Overall, the association was "pleased with the message and direction" of Obama's order and "welcomes this new attention to the cost of regulations to business and their impact on job creation," Palmieri said. But the business group remains only "cautiously optimistic" about ultimate results of the review. "EPA usually has the largest numbers of economically significant reviews because it tends to produce the most extreme and costly rules that place an overwhelming burden on manufacturers," he said.

The day after Obama unveiled the new approach to regulating in an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration announced it was pulling back from implementing a rule to reduce workplace noise, citing concerns raised during the public comment period and in talks with Sens. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, and Joe Lieberman, I-Conn.

"Hearing loss caused by excessive noise levels remains a serious occupational health problem in this country," said David Michaels, assistant secretary of Labor for occupational safety and health. "However, it is clear from the concerns raised about this proposal that addressing this problem requires much more public outreach and many more resources than we had originally anticipated. We are sensitive to the possible costs associated with improving worker protection and have decided to suspend work on this proposed modification while we study other approaches to abating workplace noise hazards."

Matthew Madia, a federal regulatory policy analyst for the advocacy group OMB Watch, said: "The statistics have proved and continue to prove that OMB is too transactional. They are reviewing more than 100 rules at a time, some of which have been in OMB's grasp for six months or more. We wanted President Obama to change the way OMB functions by making it more of a facilitator and less of a gatekeeper. Instead, the president gave us baseless claims about regulations' impacts on jobs."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.