Watchdogs rap Defense information office for improper fee collection

The former administrator of a Defense Department office that collects vital scientific and business-related information engaged in "gross mismanagement" by failing to stop employees from improperly collecting millions of dollars in fees from its Pentagon customers, according to documents the Office of Special Counsel released this week.

The findings conclude a nearly two-year investigation by OSC and the Defense Department Inspector General's Office into questionable business practices by the Defense Technical Information Center, which reports to the undersecretary of Defense for acquisition, technology and logistics.

Investigators found that during a recent two-year period, DTIC employees improperly charged indirect costs for the goods and services they provided to their federal customers through their Information Analysis Center program.

"DTIC collected fees in excess of its actual costs and did not return its surpluses to its customers," OSC wrote in a Sept. 29 letter to President Obama. "As a result, DoD overcharged its customers by $12.1 million in FY 2007 and $9.7 million in FY 2008."

The IG audit report concluded the office violated the 1933 Economy Act when it used the fee surpluses to augment its budget and finance DTIC-wide investment opportunities -- a violation of federal accounting principles.

The allegations were first disclosed by a whistleblower, Russ Daul, the former director of the Resource Management Directorate at DTIC. Daul allowed OSC to release his name, the letter said.

IG investigators also found that R. Paul Ryan, the former administrator of DTIC, was notified of the improper accounting of fees but failed to establish a process to correct the errors, or to accumulate actual costs.

"We conclude that Mr. Ryan's actions … constituted gross mismanagement as defined by applicable standards," the IG wrote in the June report. "However, we found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation of abuse of authority."

Ryan's actions jeopardized DTIC's ability to perform its mission by damaging the office's reputation and credibility among its customers and with Congress, the audit said.

The former administrator disagreed with the conclusions, telling the IG that his actions "may have constituted simple negligence," but did not rise to the level of gross mismanagement. Ryan added the office's fee management process was well-known and tacitly approved of by other authorities, and the collected fees represented approximated actual costs.

In July, Ryan was moved out of DTIC and detailed to a nonsupervisory position in the Defense Department's chief technology office. The department has not yet named a new permanent administrator.

In response to the investigative findings, Defense has begun a comprehensive review of DTIC operations, including a full assessment of the office's financial accounting systems. In addition, a new review board will establish a plan for determining and returning the surplus fees, the OSC letter said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.