Plea agreement for ex-special counsel in limbo

A plea deal that would have spared former Special Counsel Scott Bloch a prison sentence for withholding information from federal investigators regarding allegations he used an IT firm to "scrub" files from his work computer is on hold after a judge raised questions about it during a hearing on Wednesday.

Bloch headed the Office of Special Counsel, an independent agency whose role is to protect federal employees against prohibited personnel practices, from 2004 through late 2008. He was expected to be sentenced to probation on Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colombia, based on an agreement between prosecutors and defense attorneys. But U.S. Magistrate Judge Deborah A. Robinson said language in a federal statute could be interpreted to indicate that if Bloch entered a guilty plea, he would have to be sentenced to a minimum of one month in prison.

Bloch's attorneys indicated he would withdraw his guilty plea if the court imposed a mandatory minimum sentence. Robinson requested that both sides submit briefs on the matter to the court.

Bloch pleaded guilty in April to one count of criminal contempt of Congress, a misdemeanor that carries a sentence of up to six months in prison. Prosecutors did not object to Bloch's request for probation, arguing that he did not have a criminal history and could face sanctions on his ability to practice law. He currently works at the law firm of Tarone & McLaughlin in Washington.

Bloch's attorney, William Sullivan, a partner in the Washington law firm of Winston & Strawn, did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday.

The charges date back to December 2006, when Bloch allegedly directed the computer repair firm Geeks on Call to scrub files from his office computer, as well as those of two other political appointees. At the time, Bloch was being investigated by the inspector general of the Office of Personnel Management on allegations of improperly retaliating against former employees.

The FBI raided Bloch's home and office in May 2008. Five months later, the White House forced Bloch out of his job. The office has been without a permanent leader since then.

Prosecutors alleged in court filings that Bloch "unlawfully and willfully withheld pertinent information" about the deleted files from House Oversight and Government Reform Committee staffers during a March 2008 interview.

In the days leading up to Wednesday's proceedings, several former and current federal employees submitted written statements to the court calling for Robinson to impose a prison sentence.

"By his action or inaction, he had a profound adverse effect on the lives of many people in his wake -- people like me, who innocently and in good faith sought the services of his office," wrote Jeffrey Condit, who while working as a psychologist at the Department of Veterans Affairs lodged allegations of patient neglect at VA facilities. Condit claims his superiors retaliated against him but that Bloch declined to investigate the allegations.

In October 2005, the Office of Management and Budget directed the OPM inspector general to investigate whistleblower complaints filed against Bloch. That investigation, however, was suspended when the criminal proceedings against Bloch began.

A government official with knowledge of the investigation said the OPM inquiry could resume once the criminal proceedings are finished, despite the fact Bloch is no longer a federal employee. The source said the complainants have a legal right for the case to be resolved, notwithstanding Bloch's status at OSC.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.