Senate panel approves $35B Energy-Water spending bill

The Senate Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee approved a $34.97 billion fiscal 2011 spending bill without opposition Tuesday, deferring amendments, as usual, to the full committee, which is expected to consider the measure Thursday.

The Senate proposal is more than $200 million above the $34.7 billion approved last week by a House Appropriations subcommittee, but still is $376.3 million below President Obama's request.

It is $1.5 billion above the current year's funding, 82 percent of which would go to the National Nuclear Security Administration to sustain the nuclear weapons stockpile and for nuclear nonproliferation programs, Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., said.

Dorgan said improvements and life extension of the nuclear arsenal was a key element behind the weapons reductions proposed in the new START arms control treaty awaiting Senate ratification.

He said "this is not an easy bill to put together," because the subcommittee was unable to fund many of their colleagues' requests for water projects or for the billions of dollars in Army Corps of Engineer projects that are ready to go. But, he added, the subcommittee was not willing to accept the nearly $500 million cut in water projects Obama proposed.

The panel restored money to "a majority of the ongoing projects," Dorgan said.

Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee ranking member Bob Bennett, R-Utah, agreed the panel had done as good a job as possible with the budget allocation it was given and thanked Dorgan for his bipartisan cooperation. Noting that neither of them will be back next year, Bennett said he hoped the new subcommittee leadership "will have the kind of working relations we've had."

The Energy Department would receive $28.3 billion, with $7 billion of that going to DOE's nuclear weapons programs and $2.6 billion to nonproliferation efforts to safeguard nuclear material that could be used to produce weapons.

Defense environmental cleanup programs, which mainly are at the nuclear weapons production facilities, would receive $5.3 billion. Nondefense environmental cleanup would get $244.2 million.

Energy efficiency and renewable energy initiatives would receive $2.3 billion in the bill, nuclear energy programs would get $783.2 million and fossil fuels $726 million.

DOE's science office would receive $5 billion, and the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy would get $200 million for high-risk experiments.

The bill would provide $10 billion in loan guarantees for nuclear energy programs and a similar amount for renewable energy projects.

The Corps of Engineers would be provided $5.3 billion, of which $2.5 billion would support operations and maintenance, $1.8 billion would go to construction, and the Mississippi River and Tributaries accounts would get $335 million.

The Interior Department would be allocated $1.13 billion, most of which would go to the Bureau of Reclamation's water projects, including the California Central Valley Project restoration effort.

Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., said she was disappointed that the bill contained no funding for the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository, and said she believed that the president had made a mistake in trying to close the Nevada site. Murray said she would offer an amendment in the full committee to address Yucca.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.