Strategy for boosting acquisition workforce is a step forward, report says

While the Office of Management and Budget's acquisition workforce plan does not explicitly address all the challenges set out in the 2009 Defense authorization bill, it is comprehensive enough to boost the capacity of civilian agencies' acquisition staffs, the Government Accountability Office has concluded.

In keeping with a requirement in the authorization bill, OMB issued a memo in October 2009 outlining a five-year plan to establish a structured approach for agencies to augment and improve the skills of their acquisition workforce.

The bill also directed GAO to review the plan and provide feedback. The watchdog agency's primary concern was the plan does not cover several of the areas OMB was required to address. According to the report, OMB officials said they considered these issues, including establishing a sustainable funding model for the acquisition workforce, but auditors said they had no way to verify to what extent.

Nevertheless, GAO sees the plan as a productive step forward in tackling the disparity between massive growth in contracting and the relatively stable size of the acquisition workforce.

"While OMB's plan does not address all statutory matters, it nevertheless has initiated a process that provides an opportunity to increase the capacity and capability of the civilian agencies' acquisition workforce," wrote John Needham, GAO director of acquisition and sourcing management.

As part of the review, GAO interviewed workforce managers at nine federal agencies and the Federal Acquisition Institute about the plan. They praised OMB's methodology for developing the plan, which included open meetings with acquisition personnel and focus groups to provide ongoing input and feedback.

"Agency officials indicated to us that this involvement was valuable to the planning process as it incorporated agency perspectives and has facilitated their efforts to develop individual [acquisition human capital plans]," Needham wrote.

The process requires agencies covered by the 1990 Chief Financial Officers Act to submit an acquisition human capital plan to OMB every year. The documents must identify specific strategies and goals for increasing the size and qualifications of their acquisition workforce by the end of fiscal 2014. Agencies are then required to use their plans to address staffing needs in their annual budget submissions.

Managers told auditors that OMB's expectations for the human capital plans were reasonable and implementable. Their primary challenge, so far, has been tracking data on contracting officer technical representatives and program and project managers, whose job codes don't always define them as acquisition officials.

"As agencies submit their [acquisition human capital plans] and they are reviewed by OMB to inform budgetary decisions, issues such as defining and obtaining data on the entire acquisition workforce, which includes contractors who support acquisition functions, will become increasingly important and may warrant clarification," the GAO report said.

The watchdog agency advised OMB to be flexible in refining and improving the workforce plan as time goes on. The results in identifying gaps and responding to critical staffing needs will become increasingly clear each year, and OMB should work with agencies to make necessary changes.

"The ability of OMB and the agencies to address issues that need refinement and ultimately achieve the intended outcomes of the plan will depend on their sustained collaboration and commitment to developing the acquisition workforce," Needham wrote.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.