Analysis: Labor-Management Partnership 2.0

In 2009, President Obama signed an executive order, similar to one President Clinton signed in 1993, establishing governmentwide labor-management forums and promoting partnerships between federal employee groups and agency officials.

Supporters of Clinton-era labor-management partnerships say they fostered greater cooperation between labor and management, recognized the importance of input from employees and their union representatives in agency decisions, created processes for involving front-line employees, and facilitated faster resolution of contract disputes and grievances.

Detractors argue the process sometimes excluded middle managers from important discussions, required senior managers to relinquish too much power, sank costs into attending partnership meetings that yielded meager results, required consensus-based bargaining tactics that understated critical differences, and failed to hold managers accountable for implementing partnerships.

Labor-management partnerships fared much better at some agencies than others. The most important contributor to success was support from agency chief executives and union presidents. Top executives must be prepared to do whatever it takes to ensure agency chief human capital officers and labor relations specialists understand that partnership is a legitimate approach to labor-management relations. Union chiefs must foster similar acceptance among their contract negotiations staff.

The peaks and pitfalls of establishing partnerships under Clinton's executive order yielded helpful guideposts for agency executives and union officials.

Agree on the Mission

Labor and management officials must develop a shared understanding of what their partnership is trying to accomplish. For example, they could define partnership broadly as using stakeholder involvement and cooperative problem-solving to influence the agency's direction and decisions that affect employees' work environment. Each side should integrate their priorities, such as accountability, which usually ranks high for management, and empowerment, typically a union bargaining imperative.

Get It in Writing

Draft a formal partnership agreement. In multilayered agencies, such agreements describe in detail how labor-management forums and processes will work at various levels in each division or function, and how they will foster communication and coordination across operating units. Officials should regard the agreement as a living document subject to periodic review and modification at least annually to make improvements and address problems.

Limit Consultants

Agency employees often team up with outside consultants to provide their labor-management forums with startup guidance and training. But officials should rely on them only to develop in-house facilitators who can support ongoing partnership activities without external assistance.

Provide Multiple Forums

Productive partnerships require regular, ongoing and sometimes intense interactions in scheduled and structured labor-management forums. They also create platforms for episodic, impromptu and informal exchanges of information and practices, including face-to-face meetings, virtual networks or task teams.

Develop a Process for Input

Cultivate a common understanding of the input process leading up to management decisions -- what the process entails, why it is in everyone's respective interests, what are the expectations, and what actions will occur after the process has concluded. Agencies should provide managers, employees, union officials and other stakeholders with substantive information and involvement in workplace matters before establishing policies or taking actions that affect the work environment. Management officials must provide information honestly, openly and early enough to solicit direct, informed and credible input from stakeholders.

Break the Consensus Barrier

Consensus is neither necessary nor attainable on every labor-management issue. Adopt a strive-for-consensus approach. Forum participants should make good-faith efforts to reach agreements each side can live with and publicly support. But use other methods -- voting or delegating to the forum chair -- when consensus is jointly perceived to be unnecessary or unattainable.

Develop Partnering Skills

Every participant in labor-management forums should receive training in interest-based problem-solving, strive-for-consensus decision-making and collaborative bargaining. Agencies should foster partnering skills through professional development programs and training for union stewards and agency managers. Interpersonal communication and collaboration create positive agency-union partnerships and constructive relationships with stakeholders -- all of which are vital to agency performance.

Hinda Sterling and Herb Selesnick are senior partners at the consulting firm Sterling & Selesnick Inc., which was involved in implementing Clinton administration labor-management partnerships.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.