Iraq watchdog proposes new agency to manage reconstruction

Congress and the Obama administration should establish a new agency to manage contingency relief and reconstruction efforts in Iraq, a top auditor said on Monday.

There is "broad agreement" that the existing structure for managing stabilization and reconstruction operations, or SROs, has led to poor coordination, which has inhibited proper execution, Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction Stuart Bowen told the Commission on Wartime Contracting. Bowen appeared before the commission to discuss the findings and recommendations of his office's report, "Applying Iraq's Hard Lessons to the Reform of Stabilization and Reconstruction Operations."

Audits from the Defense and State department inspectors general have indicated "the lack of a single, unified chain of command was a problem," Bowen said. He noted that in Afghanistan, Defense is responsible for training the entire civil police force, while in Iraq, the effort has been turned over to State. This is "resonant of the current discontinuities in SRO management," he said.

Bowen said the SIGIR office considered alternatives to a new agency, such as putting State, the U.S. Agency for International Development or Defense in charge of contingency reconstruction efforts.

"In the end, however, we believe that existing Cabinet agencies, if given the overall responsibility for planning and executing SROs, would put too strong a stamp on the effort and would not effectively use other talents and resources available across government," Bowen said. "The only way to truly achieve the whole-of-government approach is to fill the gaps between the existing agencies through a new organization."

In formal comments on the report, Michèle Flournoy, undersecretary of Defense for policy, said SIGIR correctly identified underfunding, lack of capacity and lack of authorities at State and USAID as the primary obstacles to an "effective and flexible" response to stability and reconstruction operations. But she dismissed the establishment of a new agency as the proper solution.

"Since the issue is chiefly one of capacity and resources as opposed to structure, a key solution would be to fix and resource existing institutions rather than create a new one," Flournoy wrote.

She also noted that Congress is unlikely to support creating a new agency "in today's fiscally constrained environment."

Jacob Lew, deputy secretary of State for management and resources, said the proposal contained "many useful ideas," but was problematic on several fronts. It shows an "overly narrow view of the challenges that face U.S. foreign policy in the coming years," he said.

Bowen appeared unfazed by the lack of support from Defense and State.

"Being a novel concept impinging upon current jurisdictions, [the new U.S. Office of Contingency Operations] will be subject to criticism," Bowen said. "But I believe that if the Congress and the administration act boldly to address the core current SRO problem -- the lack of a clear point of accountability and responsibility for the preparation and execution of SROs -- then management of these critical interagency operations could be significantly improved, reducing the waste, inefficiency and ineffectiveness that so often burdened the Iraq program."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.