Agencies find errors in Recovery Act spending reports

Stimulus reporting errors include highway projects. Stimulus reporting errors include highway projects. Jim Prisching/AP
More than 12 percent of reports filed by recipients of stimulus funds during the fourth quarter of 2009 required corrections, often because of mistakes in counting jobs, according to data released on Wednesday by the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board.

The majority of the changes involved highway projects funded by the Transportation Department. The fixes most often involved figures for jobs funded by the projects, descriptions of those jobs or amounts of money received, the data shows.

The changes led to a decline of about 4,000 jobs from the initial total for the quarter. Recipients had reported funding 599,108 jobs from Oct. 1 through Dec. 31, 2009. After the corrections, the jobs total dropped to 595,263.

Recipients of Recovery Act contracts, grants and loans are required to report quarterly on the status of their stimulus-funded projects and the amount of money spent. But the reporting process, which involves more than 90 different data elements, can be complicated and has led to significant filing errors, including overstated job totals and phantom congressional districts.

During the initial reporting period, from February through September 2009, recipients of stimulus funds had 20 days to fix errors in their reports. Under a policy recently implemented by the board, recipients can now correct mistakes in their award reports continually on, the collection Web site for reports.

On Jan. 30 2010, nearly 162,000 award reports were posted on for the final quarter of 2009. Beginning on Feb. 2 and continuing through March 15, federal agencies had the opportunity to review those reports and instruct recipients to fix errors.

Job figures accounted for most of the changes, likely as a result of a new counting formula the Obama administration adopted. In December 2009, the Office of Management and Budget dropped its much-maligned jobs "saved or created" formula, which critics suggested was subjective and impossible to verify. Recipients were asked to submit only the number of jobs the Recovery Act funded, regardless of whether the positions were in danger of being lost.

The change, which was adopted late in the year and received little publicity, might have escaped many recipients. The January reports included multiple references to jobs saved or created in the narrative column of the spending reports.

The new data shows that recipients made nearly 6,000 changes to their jobs totals. Recipients also found errors in more than 4,600 reports describing the types of jobs funded.

Most of the changes involved infrastructure projects. Just under half the highway planning and construction reports needed to be fixed, along with 43 percent of reports for federal transit formula grants.

Transportation logged the most changes among federal agencies, followed by the Health and Human Services and Housing and Urban Development departments.

California, which reported receiving the most stimulus money and funding the most jobs, also changed the most reports -- nearly 2,000 out of just over 14,000. New York was among the most accurate, changing only 8 percent of its nearly 8,000 spending reports.

The correction data will be updated on every two weeks until March 17.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.