Lawmakers pan plan to skip conference on health bill

House Republican leaders and some members of the House Democratic Caucus are lashing out at plans by congressional leaders to develop compromise healthcare legislation without going through a formal conference committee.

Democratic leaders and President Obama will discuss how to proceed at a White House meeting Tuesday afternoon. They are trying to find a way to resolve differences in House and Senate bills before Obama's State of the Union speech so they can focus on the economy during the run-up to congressional elections in November.

Bypassing a formal conference committee could allow Democratic leaders to sidestep procedural delays by Republicans, particularly in the Senate. The process would involve leaders shuttling the measure back and forth, sometimes proposing alternatives in the form of amendments, until both chambers have agreed to the same text.

That idea was skewered by Republicans, who spoke in favor of C-SPAN's request that Democratic leaders allow television coverage of healthcare negotiations. The Dec. 30 letter from C-SPAN President and CEO Brian Lamb was released Tuesday.

"Skipping a real, open conference shuts out the American people and breaks one of President Obama's signature campaign promises," said Michael Steel, a spokesman for House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio.

Added House Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence of Indiana: "The American people deserve a seat at the table. I call on the president and the Democrat leadership to take healthcare reform out of the smoke-filled rooms on Capitol Hill and to put it on C-SPAN."

Some Democrats were also unhappy with the idea of skipping a conference to settle differences in the bills.

"I am disappointed that there will be no formal conference process by which various constituencies can impact the discussion. I have not been approached about my concerns with the Senate bill, and I will be raising those at the Democratic Caucus meeting on Thursday," said Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Ariz., co-chairman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

"I and other progressives saw a conference as a means to improve the bill and have a real debate, and now with this behind-the-scenes approach, we're concerned even more," he said.

Before heading to the White House later with Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., huddled with key committee chairmen to discuss how to proceed. Democratic aides said the main focus was what guarantees the House would demand in any plan to bypass a formal conference.

"Every issue is difficult to resolve between the House and Senate. ... I think the important thing for us now is to close ranks behind the president and get a bill done," said House Democratic Caucus Chairman John Larson of Connecticut, who attended the meeting with Pelosi and other Democrats.

Anna Edney contributed to this report.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.