Rule could slow Pentagon’s revolving door

The revolving door between the Defense Department and private industry could be on the brink of slowing down.

On Thursday, the Pentagon published a final rule in the Federal Register that will require senior department officials to obtain written approval from an agency ethics officer before taking a job with a Defense contractor within two years after leaving government service.

The final rule, which stems from a provision in the fiscal 2008 Defense authorization bill, is unchanged from the Jan. 15 interim notice. The new policy went into place immediately.

The regulation prohibits Defense officials who have "participated personally and substantially in an acquisition exceeding $10 million or who [have] held a key acquisition position" from accepting a job with a defense contractor without first obtaining a written opinion from an ethics counselor. The counselor will determine which, if any, activities the official can perform on behalf of the contractor for the first two years after the official leaves government.

The rule bans the contractor from providing any salary to the official until the post-employment ethics opinion is completed. Contractors who break the rule could lose existing contracts or face suspension or debarment.

The previous law restricted former Pentagon acquisition officials from working for defense contractors during a one-year cooling off period after leaving government. Very senior employees had been subject to a two-year restriction in the past. Former federal officials are barred permanently from representing contractors on issues, such as a specific contract, they worked on while in government.

In 2006, 52 major defense contractors employed more than 86,000 former military and civilian personnel who had left Defense since 2001, according to a 2008 Government Accountability Office report. That figure included 2,435 former Defense officials who were hired between 2004 and 2006.

The Project on Government Oversight, a Washington watchdog group, filed the only comment on the new rule. POGO suggested that the central database for ethics opinions should be made public.

But the department rejected the added transparency, arguing that lawmakers did not authorize the database to be accessible to the public.

POGO's general counsel Scott Amey disagreed, noting that Congress did not make a determination either way about making the database public. He added the Obama administration's quest for openness and transparency should have been the deciding factor in the Defense Department's decision.

"Maybe Obama's lofty goals haven't trickled down to all parts of the government, but what's the harm in seeing a list of former government officials who are now working for defense contractors?" Amey said. "We have campaign finance and lobbying disclosure. Why not expose those circulating between the public and private sectors who might be a driving force behind government decisions and policies?"

The department also implemented a final rule, without change, to protect Defense contractor whistleblowers.

Contractors now are prohibited from taking any action, including demotion or termination, against an employee who reports waste, mismanagement or contract violations inside their company to federal officials.

Whistleblowers who believe their company has retaliated against them can file a complaint with the Defense Department's inspector general. The IG then will determine whether the complaint merits further inquiry, including an investigation and a written report.

The rule, mandated by provisions in the fiscal 2008 and 2009 Defense authorization acts, also requires contractors to notify their employees in writing about their whistleblower rights and protections.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

    Download
  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

    Download
  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

    Download
  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

    Download
  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.