Rule could slow Pentagon’s revolving door

The revolving door between the Defense Department and private industry could be on the brink of slowing down.

On Thursday, the Pentagon published a final rule in the Federal Register that will require senior department officials to obtain written approval from an agency ethics officer before taking a job with a Defense contractor within two years after leaving government service.

The final rule, which stems from a provision in the fiscal 2008 Defense authorization bill, is unchanged from the Jan. 15 interim notice. The new policy went into place immediately.

The regulation prohibits Defense officials who have "participated personally and substantially in an acquisition exceeding $10 million or who [have] held a key acquisition position" from accepting a job with a defense contractor without first obtaining a written opinion from an ethics counselor. The counselor will determine which, if any, activities the official can perform on behalf of the contractor for the first two years after the official leaves government.

The rule bans the contractor from providing any salary to the official until the post-employment ethics opinion is completed. Contractors who break the rule could lose existing contracts or face suspension or debarment.

The previous law restricted former Pentagon acquisition officials from working for defense contractors during a one-year cooling off period after leaving government. Very senior employees had been subject to a two-year restriction in the past. Former federal officials are barred permanently from representing contractors on issues, such as a specific contract, they worked on while in government.

In 2006, 52 major defense contractors employed more than 86,000 former military and civilian personnel who had left Defense since 2001, according to a 2008 Government Accountability Office report. That figure included 2,435 former Defense officials who were hired between 2004 and 2006.

The Project on Government Oversight, a Washington watchdog group, filed the only comment on the new rule. POGO suggested that the central database for ethics opinions should be made public.

But the department rejected the added transparency, arguing that lawmakers did not authorize the database to be accessible to the public.

POGO's general counsel Scott Amey disagreed, noting that Congress did not make a determination either way about making the database public. He added the Obama administration's quest for openness and transparency should have been the deciding factor in the Defense Department's decision.

"Maybe Obama's lofty goals haven't trickled down to all parts of the government, but what's the harm in seeing a list of former government officials who are now working for defense contractors?" Amey said. "We have campaign finance and lobbying disclosure. Why not expose those circulating between the public and private sectors who might be a driving force behind government decisions and policies?"

The department also implemented a final rule, without change, to protect Defense contractor whistleblowers.

Contractors now are prohibited from taking any action, including demotion or termination, against an employee who reports waste, mismanagement or contract violations inside their company to federal officials.

Whistleblowers who believe their company has retaliated against them can file a complaint with the Defense Department's inspector general. The IG then will determine whether the complaint merits further inquiry, including an investigation and a written report.

The rule, mandated by provisions in the fiscal 2008 and 2009 Defense authorization acts, also requires contractors to notify their employees in writing about their whistleblower rights and protections.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.