SEC, Commodity Futures Trading Commission issue oversight recommendations

The SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission on Friday issued a report recommending 20 steps to expand their oversight over exchanges to bolster the nation's financial system, including some that would require congressional action.

The two agencies worked on the report to better coordinate their oversight of securities and futures markets and close loopholes that played a role in the financial crisis.

"Our agencies rose above the usual challenges and came together to offer meaningful recommendations to improve our oversight of the financial markets," CFTC Chairman Gary Gensler said in a statement. "Now we must continue to work together to implement these recommendations and work with Congress to secure necessary changes in statute to best protect the American public."

The report calls on Congress to pass legislation that would clarify each agency's authority over products exempted by the other. It would also outline how to settle jurisdictional disputes within a firm timeline.

Congress is working on those issues as part of a revamp of the nation's financial regulatory structure. The Obama administration and a House Financial Services bill would propose joint rulemaking between the agencies for most swaps and give power to the Treasury Department to resolve any rulemaking dispute.

The draft by the House Agriculture Committee, which holds its markup next week, would take a different path: The SEC would take the lead on rulemaking for security-based swaps, while the CFTC would have authority over the other types of swaps.

As for turf disputes, under the Agriculture bill either agency could initiate a challenge in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

The report calls for legislation to give more power to the CFTC over rules for exchanges and clearinghouses under the Commodity Exchange Act, as well as require foreign boards of trade to register with the CFTC.

Separately, in a conference call on Friday, Gensler said the agencies do not have legislative language for the changes they want Congress to enact, but he added the Obama administration wants those changes made as part of the financial services reform process. Gensler also noted that if the two agencies cannot agree on whether to approve a financial product, they have proposed a process under which Congress would decide.

Gensler said the House Financial Services bill "covers appropriate goals," but that he wants to "bring more people" under it.

But the bill came under fire Friday by Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., who said on MSNBC that the measure "has so many loopholes that the loophole actually eats the rule." She also argued that "50 to 90 percent of derivatives could still be off exchange."

The bill tells "end users like equity firms, like hedge funds, 'You don't have to play by the rules,'" she said. "The Treasury Department should be ashamed of themselves. They have blessed this deal."

Treasury officials have gone back on the Obama administration's proposals, added Cantwell, a longtime critic of the futures and derivatives industry and a member of the Senate Finance Committee.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.