Appropriators, Obama agree on program terminations

House and Senate appropriators plan to ax 11 of the 48 discretionary, nonmilitary programs targeted for termination earlier this year by President Obama, according to an analysis of fiscal 2010 budget documents and appropriations bills.

Appropriators' relatively low degree of compliance with Obama's requests, which amounts to ending about 23 percent of the programs he sought to kill, highlights the tension between the president's desire to cut federal spending and Congress' penchant to consistently fund programs they deem a priority.

In the case of the remaining 37 nondefense discretionary programs, House or Senate appropriators, or both, recommended maintaining funding. To date, the House has cleared all 12 annual spending bills and the Senate has completed four.

Once both houses adopt their respective versions of the bills, they will reconcile any differences in conference. That would provide another opportunity to cut additional programs.

"The game isn't over until the bills are written," said Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan interest group. "It's up to the administration to keep [Congress'] feet to the fire."

In May Obama released a hit list of 121 programs, mandatory and discretionary, that he recommended be terminated or cut, with a total savings of $17 billion. About half of the savings would come from defense programs and almost $12 billion would come from discretionary spending.

Proposed cuts in the defense budget include terminating the F-22 fighter program, which received $2.9 billion in fiscal 2009. The House has agreed to the cut, but the Senate Appropriations Committee has not taken up its Defense Appropriations bill.

Of the 11 programs on the chopping block, the most money would be saved by cutting the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities State Grant program, which received $295 million in fiscal 2009. It is administered by the Education Department.

The program provides formula funds intended to help create and maintain drug-free, safe, and orderly environments for learning in and around schools. But the administration -- citing a 2001 Rand Drug Policy Research Center study and a 2007 assessment by the program's advisory committee - contends the program is poorly designed.

"The program does not focus on the schools most in need and the thin distribution of funding prevents many local administrators from designing and implementing meaningful interventions," the White House said in its budget.

Schools would be better served if the federal government instead provided competitive grants to concentrate a greater amount of funding to school districts with a demonstrated need, the White House said. The House and Senate Appropriations committees agreed with the White House's assessment and provided no funding for it.

Cancellation of another Education Department program, the Student Mentoring Program, would save $47 million, the amount it received in fiscal 2009.

"In March 2009, the Department's Institute of Education Sciences completed a rigorous multi-year evaluation, which found this program to be ineffective," the House Appropriations Committee said in its fiscal 2010 Labor-HHS spending bill, which was approved by the full House last month.

Cutting the Labor Department's Work Incentive Grants would save $17 million, which was what Congress provided in fiscal 2009.

Obama also sought to cut the Energy Department's Reliable Replacement Warhead program. Congress did not fund the program in fiscal 2009 and plans to agree to Obama's request for fiscal 2010.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

    Download
  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

    Download
  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

    Download
  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

    Download
  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

    Download
  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

    Download
  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.