Management nominee backs performance, accountability measures

The first federal chief performance officer and management director-designate told senators on Wednesday that if confirmed, he would use his private sector experience to improve information on the effectiveness of federal programs and to oversee Recovery Act implementation.

In advance of his nomination hearing before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, Jeffrey Zients, a prominent Washington management consultant and entrepreneur with no government experience, provided a long list of priorities he would address if he becomes deputy director for management at the Office of Management and Budget. These included developing a usable set of performance metrics, improving the effectiveness of government according to those measures, revitalizing the federal workforce, and increasing transparency and accountability across government.

OMB Director Peter R. Orszag has identified Zients as the administration official who will work to establish a new method of evaluating program performance akin to the Bush administration's Program Assessment Rating Tool. Zients applauded the PART system for measuring performance at the program level for the first time, but said it did not significantly increase the use of performance information in decision-making.

"The test of a performance management system is, is it being used to make important resource allocation and budget decisions," Zients said during the hearing. "I'm looking forward, if confirmed, to taking a collaborative approach, working with all the stakeholders, to develop a system."

Zients' longtime friend Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., praised the nominee's expertise in financial management and business strategy, as well as his character and sound judgment. "President Obama could not have found someone better-suited for the job," Bennet said. Committee Chairman Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., said the panel will expect Zients to apply that expertise in government, if confirmed. While touting his resume, Zients acknowledged that systems and best practices from the private sector are not directly transferable.

"I recognize and appreciate that government is different from the private sector," he said. "If confirmed, I would seek to apply and instill government best practices more broadly while, at the same time, drawing on approaches and models that have proved successful in the private sector."

Joining government means learning a whole new language, and Zients addressed the issues behind a number of the federal buzzwords, including "competitive sourcing" and "inherently governmental." The nominee said that if confirmed, he would support Obama's call for a clearer definition of inherently governmental work and discourage agencies from outsourcing core competencies.

"We must recognize there are critical functions that, even if not inherently governmental, should be performed by federal employees to make sure organizations have the internal capability and capacity to maintain control of their operations," he said. "An agency may have both federal employees and contractors performing many of these functions; however, the agency must make sure there is always enough in-house talent and capacity in these functions both to maintain control of the organization and of any contractors who are providing support."

When a decision is made to conduct a public-private job competition, Zients said the government must ensure it is conducted fairly and in a timely manner, and that cost savings can be measured objectively.

If confirmed, Zients will oversee implementation of economic stimulus spending in a number of ways, including issuing guidance to agencies and collecting data. He said he expected to move quickly to improve spending data relevant to the Recovery Act and apply any knowledge gained to long-term efforts such as USAspending.gov.

"With Recovery Act reporting from recipients and subrecipients set to begin in October, it will be important to concentrate resources in the immediate term on ensuring the recovery data collection effort is successful and stable going forward," he said. "However, along the way, we should be planning on a broader deployment of the recovery solution so that transparency of federal spending extends to all taxpayer dollars."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.