IG: Energy needs to improve contractor oversight

When auditors from the Energy Department's inspector general office met with officials in the Office of River Protection to review the government's administration of a major service contract, the officials never told the auditors that they were not federal employees, but contractors working on the very contract the IG was investigating.

The distinction is important. Federal policy issued by the Office of Management and Budget prohibits contractors from drafting agency responses to inquiries from Congress, IG offices, and the Government Accountability Office because of the appearance of private influence on the public interest.

That was just one of the problems auditors reported after reviewing Energy's contract with Project Assistance Corp. for plutonium waste disposal at the Hanford Site in southeastern Washington state. Overall, auditors found that Energy had not established adequate controls to effectively oversee the contractor and its many subcontractors.

Energy hired PAC in 2003 to perform a range of services, including project management; risk and program assessments; quality assurance; safety, cost and schedule estimating; budgeting and finance; and engineering associated with the storage, treatment and disposal of more than 53 million gallons of highly radioactive waste from more than 40 years of plutonium production at Hanford.

Between 2005 and 2008, the annual cost for the contract with PAC almost doubled from $4.7 million to $9.2 million.

The auditors reported that "PAC employees developed their own scope of work for services to be provided to the Office of River Protection and approved funding authorizations for procurement requests related to PAC's own contract."

Specifically, the contractors prepared statements of work for 16 of the 27 requests to change elements of its contract and established the federal requirements for work performed under the contract. Contractors also operated as the program budget official and/or the certifying official for 29 of 80 procurement requests and authorizations between 2006 and 2008.

In addition, contractors shared offices with government personnel -- another violation of OMB policy.

"The close proximity of contractor and federal employees increased the risk that the federal managers over-relied on contractors to define work to be performed and approve funding for such work," the report said.

J.E. Surash, Energy's deputy assistant secretary for acquisition and project management, largely concurred with the IG's findings in an April 3 memo to George Collard, assistant inspector general for performance audits.

Many of the issues the IG raised were discovered in a self assessment by the Office of River Protection prior to the audit, Surash noted. As a result, the office is in the process of developing stronger internal controls to prevent contractor conflicts of interest and plans to physically separate contractors from federal employees by the end of the fiscal year.

The office also has assigned a federal employee responsibility for responding to inquiries from Congress, the IG and GAO.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.