Obama camp steering clear of transition talk

The congressional Democratic superdelegates are mostly on board the Obama train, based on their rhetoric and activities in Denver this week. But a growing divide has become apparent with the top brass of the nominee's campaign.

Many Democratic lawmakers are eager to plan for the transition to what they hope will be an Obama presidency, and even beyond to the 2009 agenda. The Obama team, however, has cooperated only on a limited basis and is reluctant to show any signs of looking beyond Nov. 4.

Lawmakers are anxious because they know that if Barack Obama, D-Ill., is elected president and Democrats increase their House and Senate majorities, they would face a heavy legislative lift and high public expectations. "We need to be prepared for how we want to move in January," said Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut. Discussions have begun between the Obama campaign and Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee -- the tax-writing panel that would face demands for early action on several major topics -- two committee members said this week.

"Top Obama people have met with Ways and Means Democrats on multiple issues, including taxes, trade, and entitlements," said Rep. Ron Kind of Wisconsin. "They have listened to us and our concerns. And we have started to look for consensus." Although he did not specify all of the participants, Kind said that they included Phil Schiliro, the campaign's senior congressional liaison.

Rep. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, another Ways and Means member, said that economic staff on the campaign have "reached out to Ways and Means" with discussion of economic stimulus proposals, among other topics. Van Hollen cautioned that both sides "don't want to get ahead of ourselves or appear presumptuous" but that they are mindful "you have to lay some groundwork... about how to move different pieces."

On national security, Rep. Ellen Tauscher of California said that low-key talks have begun with key congressional players, including herself. "I feel very comfortable that Senator Obama's transition team will work closely with members of Congress after the election," she said.

Even some lawmakers, however, are wary of pushing too hard to plan for what happens after November. "We will have time after the election," said Rep. Jim McGovern of Massachusetts, a senior member of the House Rules Committee. "I am Irish and superstitious. We have to fight like hell."

Although top Obama campaign officials want to be respectful of individual members of Congress, they have privately indicated that they want to keep their distance from one of the nation's most unpopular institutions.

For public consumption, they emphasize that they are focused on the next two months. Transition planning "does not consume much of our time," campaign manager David Plouffe said in a Wednesday interview with Convention Daily. For now, he added, "all you can do is get a framework in place."

Convention Daily separately has learned that Tom Daschle, the former Senate majority leader who is advising Obama, has quietly asked John Podesta to organize the transition effort, which is in a preliminary phase. Podesta, President Clinton's former chief of staff, is hailed by many Democrats as a seasoned Washington insider who understands executive governance and all of the burdens of getting off to a smooth start.

Alexis Simendinger contributed to this story.

For full coverage of the Democratic National Convention, go to NationalJournal.com.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.