CBO: Scale of contract operations in Iraq is unprecedented

One out of every $5 the U.S. government has spent on the war in Iraq has gone to contractors, and the ratio of contract workers to troops is higher than in any previous major armed conflict, according to a report released on Tuesday.

The study by the Congressional Budget Office found that from 2003 through 2007, the Defense Department and other federal agencies awarded about $85 billion in Iraq contracts, representing about 20 percent of total spending on Iraq operations. Iraq contract spending is expected to reach $100 billion by the end of the Bush administration.

The chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, which requested the report, expressed sticker shock.

"The Bush administration's move to outsource large portions of the Iraq war effort sets a dangerous precedent," said Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D. "The increasing use of private contractors restricts accountability and oversight, opens the door to corruption and abuse, and in some instances, may significantly increase the cost to American taxpayers."

Most of the contracts have been for logistical support, construction, oil and food. The most expensive is the Army's Logistics Civil Augmentation umbrella support services contract, which supplies troops with a range of services, including meals, mail, laundry and sanitation.

From 2003 through 2007, the Army obligated $22 billion for LOGCAP services. The current LOGCAP contract is held by three contractors and has a $50 billion ceiling.

CBO's tally did not include contracts performed outside of the theater, such as the manufacture of major weapons systems or mine-resistant ambush-protected vehicles -- even if that equipment was eventually sent to Iraq.

The report presents the most comprehensive accounting to date of the role contractors have played in the war. The budget office estimated that there are now more than 190,000 contractors in Iraq.

CBO did not discuss the implications of such a buildup in wartime contractors or the degree to which the contracts could have been subject to waste, fraud or abuse.

But, at a press conference on Tuesday, CBO Director Peter Orszag noted that U.S. troops already are spending far more time in the theater and less time at home than the military would prefer. Without private contractors, he said, soldiers "would be running at an even less sustainable rate."

Orszag noted, however, that the scale of the contractor deployment in the Iraq conflict is virtually unprecedented. The report found that there is roughly one contractor on the ground in Iraq for every member of the military. That rate is 55 times higher than in the 1990 Gulf War, seven times higher than World War II and five times higher than in Vietnam.

The only other major military operation that ranks close to Iraq in the use of private contractors was the conflict in the Balkans in the 1990s, in which there also was a 1-to-1 ratio. But that was a much smaller operation, involving at most 20,000 U.S. troops at any given time.

"In general, the U.S. government has placed greater emphasis in recent decades on outsourcing activities to the private sector that are not inherently governmental," the report stated. "The government's policy is to subject services identified as commercial to the forces of competition. In addition, the ratio of contractor personnel to military personnel reflects the United States' attempt to reconstruct Iraq while military activities are under way, rather than delaying rebuilding until hostilities have ended."

The Defense Department did not respond to a request for comment about the report.

Slightly more than 20 percent of the 190,000 contractors currently working in Iraq are U.S. citizens, CBO found. Meanwhile, nearly 37 percent of the contracting workforce is Iraqi nationals while more than 42 percent come from third-party countries.

These third-country nationals, Conrad said, fall into an ambiguous gray area, where their legal status remains undefined and where accountability and oversight by the U.S. military is increasingly difficult.

"The record number of private contractors in Iraq raises a host of serious concerns," Conrad said. "There are billions of taxpayer dollars being funneled to both American and foreign companies, often through no-bid contracts. Ongoing Pentagon audits have revealed that vast sums of this money have been misspent or improperly recorded."

CBO also was able for the first time to quantify the number of private security contractors that are working in Iraq and how their cost compares to that of guards from the U.S. military.

There are 25,000 to 30,000 private guards in Iraq, the report stated. Thirty percent to 40 percent of them work directly for the U.S. government as prime contractors and the rest work for the Iraqi government, other coalition governments or corporations. About three-quarters of the private security guards are armed with weapons, CBO said.

The budget office estimated that that the U.S. government has spent from $3 billion to $4 billion on the private guards since 2003. That cost was comparable, and in some cases, less, than if the work had been performed by the military.

"That analysis indicates that the costs of the private contractor did not differ greatly from the costs of having a comparable military unit performing similar functions," the report stated. "During peacetime, however, the military unit would remain in the force structure and continue to accrue costs at a peacetime rate, whereas the private security contract would not have to be renewed."

Alan Chvotkin, vice president of the Professional Services Council, a trade group representing contractors, said the report did not include any surprising figures, and CBO deserved credit for presenting clear and unbiased data and for clarifying some contested points about the cost and preponderance of contractors.

"This is a welcome report in that gets the facts out there," Chvotkin said. "And it unmistakably debunked a number of these great myths about Iraq that many people want to believe."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.