Senate budget would boost advance appropriations by $4 billion

The Senate fiscal 2009 budget resolution envisions a roughly $4 billion boost in "advance appropriations" above President Bush's request, bringing total discretionary spending to $22 billion over his budget. That is double the increase in advance appropriations -- a time-honored budgetary gimmick utilized by both parties -- enacted last year, which quietly got through with barely a hint of protest from the White House.

The House's fiscal 2009 budget resolution is not as generous as the Senate's in that regard, limiting their advance appropriations increase to about $2 billion -- but overall that brings the House's discretionary spending allocation to more than $25 billion over Bush's request. Advance funding, by which appropriations are provided for future fiscal years, generally does not elicit much attention in part because it can be difficult to explain.

"There's no reason to do it other than to increase spending," said Jason Delisle, an education analyst at the New America Foundation. Backers "want the money by any means necessary, but the trade-off is the debate gets confused and the budget lacks transparency."

Advance funding for education grew out of a timing quirk whereby the academic year usually spans parts of two fiscal years. Beginning in fiscal 1996, Congress began using advance appropriations to increase education funding for a given school year while technically staying within that fiscal year's discretionary spending cap, according to a New America report. Since then the gimmick has become wildly popular -- what started out as $1.3 billion in advance education funding in fiscal 1996 grew to $17 billion in fiscal 2008, the report notes.

The New America report said the use of advance appropriations makes it difficult to compare actual year-over-year education funding totals. It can also cause problems in future years should budgetary circumstances change. During floor debate on the fiscal 2008 Labor-HHS spending bill in the summer, Labor-HHS Appropriations ranking member James Walsh, R-N.Y., made the latter point. "My concern is that advance funding can cause serious problems if future allocations for this bill are not as robust," Walsh said. In all, last year Congress provided a $2.4 billion boost in advance appropriations above Bush's request.

While a great deal was made of the Democratic leadership's acquiescence to Bush's overall budget demands, in fact Democrats spent a great deal more than Bush wanted. Technically, they ended up at Bush's proposed $933 billion spending limit. But after factoring in another $11 billion in emergency spending that Bush did not request, Democrats reached the midway point between their overall $22 billion. "When it was all said and done it was about a split-the-difference deal," said Senate Budget Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D. In fact, it was even better than that for the Democrats. After adding in the $2.4 billion in advance appropriations and another $6.4 billion Bush quietly signed into law as part of the must-pass Defense appropriations bill, Democrats in total spent nearly $20 billion over the president's requested limit.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.