OMB announces new cap on executive compensation costs in federal contracts

The ceiling on executive compensation costs under government contracts is $14,284 higher in fiscal 2008 than in fiscal 2007, according to an administration memo released Tuesday.

The Office of Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy announced that $612,196 is the maximum amount a company can charge the government under cost reimbursement contracts to compensate an executive. Last year's amount was $597,912.

According to the memo, the compensation limit is the median amount of compensation accrued over a recent 12-month period for the top five highest paid executives of publicly traded companies with annual sales over $50 million. The $612,196 figure limits only the executive compensation that companies can claim as a cost in government contracts; it does not limit total compensation.

OFPP has calculated a benchmark compensation amount annually since 1997 in consultation with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Defense Contract Audit Agency.

Alan Chvotkin, vice president and general counsel for the Professional Services Council, says that while the industry association is generally wary of arbitrary compensation caps, this is a long-standing policy they have come to accept. "The amount is probably fair and reflects a benchmark," said Chvotkin.

The compensation of executives at companies doing business with the government has been a hot topic recently. Blackwater Worldwide chief executive Erik Prince refused to disclose his personal compensation during a House hearing in October 2007. Soon after, Rep. Christopher Murphy, D-Conn., introduced the 2007 Government Contractor Accountability Act (H.R.3928), which would require contractors to disclose the names and salaries of their most highly compensated officers if more than 80 percent of the company's annual revenue comes from federal contracts and it holds contracts worth more than $5 million in any fiscal year.

Chvotkin has testified against Murphy's legislation and said Tuesday that the compensation limit for contracts is partly why he believes the law is unnecessary.

"His [Murphy's] view is that the federal government ought to know what private companies pay their executives; my answer is why? The government is not paying unlimited amounts; [privately held contracting companies] are subject to the same cap … so the government knows they are not paying more than $612,196 toward salary," Chvotkin said.

Murphy has said taxpayers have a right to know more about what kind of profits private companies are making from government contracts. H.R. 3928 is currently in committee.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.