HHS report reignites fight over profit margins in Medicare

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., and ranking member Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, Friday said they would seek information from the Department of Health and Human Services inspector general about fees that community pharmacies incur when distributing prescriptions through Medicare Part D.

A new report from the department's OIG found that local pharmacies are paid by private drug plan sponsors about 18 percent more on average than the cost of acquiring the drugs, or about $9 per prescription. But that estimate did not include "dispensing" fees that reflect payroll and other overhead costs such as rent.

In its report, OIG indicated that dispensing costs appear to wipe out any profits made by local pharmacies. Using pharmacies' estimates of their costs, OIG estimated them to be about $9 per prescription on average, with individual reports ranging from $3 to $19. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services expressed concern with OIG's estimate of pharmacies' dispensing costs because the number could not be independently verified. OIG's estimate of dispensing fees is not inconsistent with industry-funded studies showing them to be about $10 per prescription. Those costs vary widely between high-volume and low-volume pharmacies.

Baucus and Grassley are keenly interested in protecting low-volume rural pharmacies from being driven out of business. They have together championed several proposals to change Part D to allow require faster, easier payment to pharmacies.

Baucus said the OIG's estimate of pharmacy profits "doesn't tell the whole story. In addition to buying the drugs, pharmacies stock them locally, spend time and effort to fill the prescriptions, answer questions and check drug interactions." Grassley said the 18 percent profit margin is good news, but he wants the OIG to collect additional information on dispensing fees. "I am hopeful that, as with this study, the Inspector General will find that pharmacies should be operating in the black on Medicare Part D."

Community pharmacies say they are being forced to shut their doors because they are not reimbursed appropriately under Medicare.

"It certainly makes the point that our margins are razor-thin right now. We can't stand much more squeezing," said Charles Sewell, senior vice president of government affairs for the National Community Pharmacists Association. But the Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, which represents pharmacy benefit managers, including Part D plan providers, said the OIG report will put a damper on some of the community pharmacies' complaints.

"This is going to raise a few eyebrows among members of Congress who had been led to believe that independent pharmacies are doing much worse than this report shows," PCMA President Mark Merritt said. "Making 18 percent more than buying is more, by far, than people thought pharmacies were getting."

Sewell countered that independent pharmacies are operating on a 1.3 percent net margin. "That's not very good. If you want to invest in pharmacies, you'd do much better just to put the money in the bank."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.