Office of Special Counsel sees progress in Hatch Act probe

The Office of Special Counsel is pushing ahead with its investigation of suspected Hatch Act violations involving White House political operatives, despite new criticism of Special Counsel Scott Bloch and his probe.

An OSC Hatch Act team is reviewing thousands of documents received from agencies and has begun interviewing officials at smaller agencies, among them the Office of National Drug Control Policy, an OSC spokesman said. In July, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, which is conducting a separate investigation, released documents indicating top agency officials traveled around the country at taxpayer expense to make appearances with vulnerable Republican congressional candidates.

The White House and the Drug Control Policy office have said the officials were there to talk about drug programs, not politics.

After the disclosure in March that a White House official gave a PowerPoint briefing on Republican plans for the 2008 congressional elections to appointees at the General Services Administration, Bloch announced OSC had launched a probe of the presentations, which was later disclosed to have been given to appointees at most large agencies.

The OSC is charged enforcing the Hatch Act's ban on partisan politics by federal employees. Though it is doubtful the briefings themselves violated the act, the investigation will likely focus on whether the presentations spurred actions by federal officials to help Republican candidates, through such steps as awarding contracts or grants in targeted congressional districts, according to Hatch Act experts. Explicit discussions by White House or agency officials about partisan political activity may have been illegal.

Since it began, OSC's investigation -- and Bloch's role in it -- has been criticized by nonprofit whistleblower rights groups aligned against Bloch. Since 2005, the Office of Personnel Management's inspector general has been looking into whether Bloch dismissed whistleblower cases without enough examination and retaliated against employees who opposed his policies. That investigation ultimately could lead to a recommendation that President Bush remove Bloch.

Debra Katz, an attorney who represents some of the OSC employees, accused Bloch of using the Hatch Act investigation to inoculate himself from possible firing by the White House, a charge Bloch adamantly rejects.

Controversy over Bloch gained renewed attention last week amid the disclosure that investigators found he had hired a computer service last winter to erase his computer's hard drive, potentially erasing files relevant to the investigation.

Bloch said the files were not relevant and that he hired the company due to a computer virus. He added that because of the ongoing Hatch Act probe, the OPM IG has a conflict of interest in its investigation of him. Bloch has declined to recuse himself from OSC's investigation, though he is not involved in its day-to-day activity.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.