Critics say problems at State IG's office will persist

The resignation of State Department Inspector General Howard Krongard Friday may end a controversy over charges that Krongard obstructed sensitive investigations, but oversight officials say persistent organizational problems will continue to keep the IG's office from functioning effectively. "Nothing has been changed as a result of the IG resigning in regards to the concerns we raised," Jeffrey Steinhoff, GAO's managing director for financial management and assurance, said Monday.

In an October report, GAO said the State IG's budget had fallen in real terms by about 6 percent since 2001, even as State's overall budget grew by 50 percent. And in testimony before a House panel, Comptroller General David Walker said GAO has warned Congress for 30 years that a 1906 law requiring the State IG to regularly inspect all overseas bureaus eats up most of the office's discretionary budget, leaving little money for other oversight duties.

Though Congress annually waives that inspection mandate, the State IG must budget for it each year. The law, originally meant to ensure President Theodore Roosevelt's control of far-flung embassies, makes little modern sense, critics say.

"If State is going to have scare resources, it ought to be putting its money where the real critical high-risk areas are," said Beverly Lumpkin, an investigator with the nonprofit Project on Government Oversight, which is producing a report on inspectors general across government. "That is not vetting every overseas post every five years like clockwork."

GAO has also said the IG's office's reliance on career foreign service officials to head inspection teams and on former State Department managers to fill senior positions limits the office's independence.

House Foreign Affairs Oversight Subcommittee Chairman William Delahunt, D-Mass., is working with GAO on a bill to address problems with the State IG's office. A Delahunt aide said the lawmaker hopes to introduce the measure early next year.

"While I hope that Mr. Krongard will be replaced by a professional from the inspector general community, [GAO] has identified numerous structural problems with the State IG's office, and we will continue our efforts to address those," Delahunt said in statement.

Krongard, who has said he will vacate his post on Jan. 15, has criticized some of the office restrictions. "I did not create this inspection-oriented regime, nor do I necessarily agree with it," Krongard said in a Nov. 8 letter to Delahunt.

In defending himself against charges that he blocked investigations into State Department activities in Iraq and Afghanistan, Krongard has said repeatedly that he was influenced by budget constraints. He has pointed to various public statements in which he suggested the office needed more money. Even before his confirmation "it became very obvious to me that the office was significantly underresourced," Krongard said in the same letter, citing his testimony at his confirmation hearing.

In addition, Krongard has also said the IG's office had been hindered by internal battles even before he arrived. "We have enough challenges to focus on without spending energy in rivalries between functional offices," he wrote Friday in an e-mail informing his staff of his resignation.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.