Work continues on spying bills despite veto threats

Democrats and Republicans in both chambers clashed Thursday in a blizzard of activity over bills that would restrict the Bush administration's spying powers, even as the White House lobbed veto threats against the measures.

Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee had successfully amended a bill approved by the Senate Intelligence Committee last month to overhaul the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act while defeating Republican efforts to change the bill. The committee was expected to continue working on the bill Thursday afternoon, including a debate about immunity for telecommunications companies that reportedly helped the Bush administration spy on terrorism suspects without warrants.

House Democrats, meanwhile, moved their FISA bill back to the floor and successfully adopted a "closed rule" for debate that prohibits Republicans from offering changes. House debate on the bill also is expected to resume later Thursday.

Over objections of Republicans and the White House, Senate Judiciary Democrats changed the first title of the Intelligence Committee's bill. On a party-line 10-9 vote, substitute language drafted by Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and other Democrats was approved.

"What we've done in this substitute is try to add critical protections and make the job of the FISA court meaningful," Leahy said. The White House issued a letter late Wednesday vowing to veto the bill over the substitute language. Leahy said the White House objections mainly referred to language from last week, which he said was changed.

But Judiciary Republicans complained that Democrats' new language was not circulated until late Wednesday. "It's a little hard to review something in depth that's 55 pages long and immediately crank out a letter in response to that," said Jon Kyl, R-Ariz. "This substitute was not put together in consultation with members of the minority."

Democrats also approved an amendment that would require all FISA revisions to expire in four years. They approved another amendment that would clarify that the administration can only conduct warrantless surveillance against someone reasonably believed to be outside the United States when the "significant purpose" is to collect foreign intelligence information.

Partisan debate also erupted in the House. Disagreement over the debate rules showed that the bill is no less divisive than it was several weeks ago. Republicans could offer a procedural motion to recommit the bill to committee, which previously divided Democrats and derailed the bill.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., and Intelligence Committee Chairman Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas, unveiled substitute language Wednesday aimed at addressing those concerns. But the White House said it would veto the new bill.

Rep. Rush Holt, D-N.J., said the reworked bill "will ensure that it is the courts -- and not an executive branch political appointee -- who decides whether or not the communications of an American citizen can be seized and searched, and that such seizures and searches must be done pursuant to a court order."

Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., criticized Democrats for not giving the minority a chance to offer input on revisions to the measure in the weeks since it was last on the floor. Their "take-it-or-leave-it strategy on this bill is dangerous and is destined to fail," he said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.