Trade group calls for reforms to appointments process

An industry association on Wednesday released a report calling for a governmentwide simplification of the confirmation process for presidential appointees, higher compensation for senior leaders, and clarification of post-employment restrictions and financial reporting requirements.

"Extensive and extended vacancies in key leadership posts, particularly in a time of war, raise significant public policy concerns," said John Douglass, outgoing president and chief executive officer of the Aerospace Industries Association. "Vacancies can affect the checks and balances that maintain integrity in our government."

The AIA report examined the confirmation process for 50 political appointees in the Defense Department. But the problems identified are relevant at civilian agencies as well, Douglass said.

When the AIA committee conducting the study began its work, a quarter of the 50 jobs examined were either vacant or were filled by an acting official, said Whit Cobb, who sits on the committee and is the vice president and general counsel of BAE Systems.

"These vacancies, we found, are not without consequences," Cobb said. "The people who fill these positions are those who directly implement the constitutional principle of civilian control of the military." Cobb noted that officials serving in acting capacities may wear more than one hat. The lack of permanent leaders can contribute to problems with employee morale and allow for corruption, he said.

Cobb and Douglass said the study found that the biggest hurdle to public service was the strenuousness of the confirmation process.

"There are so many players and so many opportunities for a nominee to be rejected," Cobb said. "When you put it all together, it deters all but the most stout-hearted from even attempting to be confirmed."

The report recommended that strict guidelines be set for each stage in the vetting process. The group also suggested that requests for information from the nominees should be centralized and standardized to avoid redundancy.

In addition to the complications of the process, the AIA report said pay differentials between executives in the public and private sectors were another major barrier.

"The pay issue takes many, many people out of play," Cobb said. "It causes people who would have served for a longer period of time to serve for a shorter period of time. It makes people more concerned about money and more concerned about their next opportunity rather than thinking about doing the best job."

Douglass said he felt the impact of taking a lower salary to serve the public when he worked on the Senate Armed Services Committee rather than taking a private-sector job after retiring from the military.

"By the time I'd been there about three years, my savings were gone completely," he said. "I had no money in the bank. I was beginning to accrue debt, and at that point in your life, that's a very negative thing. My lifestyle was very modest -- a little house here in town, one car, a working wife."

Douglass cautioned that the government should not seek pay parity with the private sector, but said the penalty for serving the government should not prohibitive.

"Most people look at government service as a service," he said. "There is a lower level at which people can't pay their mortgages and car payments and keep the kids in school. Certainly, we're not saying there needs to be parity. But the scales are so low now."

As a remedy, the report recommended making Executive Schedule appointees eligible for locality pay, establishing signing bonuses to compensate for moving expenses and pay differentials, narrowing financial divestiture requirements, and providing job search assistance to the spouses of appointees who relocate as a result of their appointments.

The report also recommended making the restrictions on employment after a period of government service less ambiguous. AIA called for a universal one-year ban on employment with businesses that work with the government.

Douglass said it is critical to discuss reforms, because there is still time to change the system before a new administration begins to make appointments.

"If you have to call many, many CEOs, or many, many businesspeople, or many, many intellectuals to get someone to take the job," Douglass said, "that seems to indicate that you're not getting the best and the brightest."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.