Old tools hamper drug inspections, observers say

Outdated information technology systems are frustrating the Food and Drug Administration's inspections of foreign drugs, former FDA officials and the government's watchdog agency told lawmakers Thursday.

The testimony was presented at a House Energy and Commerce Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee hearing on FDA's inspection program.

FDA's import electronic screening system "is screening against present data. It is not monitoring products," said Benjamin England, a 17-year FDA veteran who left his most recent position as regulatory counsel in July 2003.

Eight years ago, when the FDA came before Congress to answer questions about the same topic, lawmakers were told that the agency's drug import programs and its IT systems were broken, England said, adding that they remain broken today.

The stand-alone systems, containing data in incompatible formats, are largely the result of a lack of integration within the FDA itself, England added. Many of the witnesses said "the missing piece" in the broken program is funding.

England said any action the subcommittee takes should first include a significant investment for re-engineering FDA's IT systems.

Marcia Crosse, the Government Accountability Office's healthcare director, said that "it's certainly true that resources" are "a major constraint here." Her testimony noted that GAO's preliminary results indicate that more than nine years after GAO last reported on the topic, FDA still does not know how many foreign facilities are subject to inspection.

One database calculated that about 3,000 establishments could have been subject to inspection in fiscal 2007, while another put the number at about 6,800, Crosse testified. Despite such disparate estimates, FDA uses the data to generate a list of 3,249 establishments when prioritizing facilities for inspection.

Former FDA Associate Commissioner William Hubbard, who left the agency in 2005, said a relatively small investment in IT funding could make oversight far more effective.

FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach said in written testimony that since taking his position last December, upgrading FDA's IT systems has been one of his top priorities. He added that data on foreign firms is hard to confirm because the agency cannot easily gain access to those firms.

Also, information provided by importers often leads to duplicate entries because of name, configuration and address changes. Eschenbach noted that FDA has created a board to address the data accuracy issues, adding that the agency's IT chief is crafting a two-year plan to overhaul the IT infrastructure.

"Despite the challenges which face us, the American drug supply continues to be among the safest in the world," Eschenbach stated.

Rep. Michael Burgess, R-Texas, a physician, said, "The FDA does not shoulder all the blame in this situation," when many people, including those in Congress, could not have anticipated the influx of drug imports coming into the United States.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.