Intel suffers from weak congressional oversight, senators told

Key senators and former members of the 9/11 Commission on Tuesday said congressional oversight of the nation's intelligence community remains dysfunctional, despite repeated attempts to make reforms.

In an effort to address the ongoing problems, Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., and other senators introduced a bipartisan resolution that would create a single committee in the Senate with the power to authorize and appropriate funding for the intelligence community.

The concept was proposed by the 9/11 Commission in 2004, but has never gained traction in Congress.

"Few things are more difficult to change in Washington than committee jurisdiction," former Rep. Lee Hamilton, D-Ind., who co-chaired the 9/11 Commission, told a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing.

Hamilton said the nation is "less safe" because Congress is not conducting effective oversight of the intelligence community.

Hamilton and panel members said a major problem is lack of coordination between the Intelligence Committee, which authorizes intelligence programs and spending, and the Senate Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, which allocates the money. The intelligence community received $43.5 billion in fiscal 2007, according to recently declassified figures.

Senate Intelligence Chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., called the idea of combining authorizing and appropriating power into one committee "deeply attractive," but said he does not believe enough senators would vote for doing so. He said the proposal could actually weaken the Intelligence Committee if it failed because appropriators would know their power was not threatened.

Former Rep. Tim Roemer, D-Ind., who also served on the 9/11 Commission, said "there's no doubt that there is a battle going on here in the Senate and over in the House" between authorizers and appropriators.

Senate Intelligence ranking member Christopher (Kit) Bond, R-Mo., said billions have been misspent due to the lack of coordination.

In an effort to improve coordination, the Intelligence and Appropriations committees signed an agreement in February to share information and jointly make budget decisions. Bond said the agreement has failed. "I can tell you that if change has occurred I haven't seen it," Bond said.

Rockefeller said he believes the agreement "has made great strides toward bringing our committees together in a unity of effort that was lacking before." But he said he is looking for solutions to problems that persist.

Bond said he favors the idea of enacting a law that requires the appropriators to take input from the authorizers.

Rockefeller said another major problem is that the Bush administration refuses to share information with his committee.

"For years, the White House and the intelligence community have repeatedly withheld information and documents -- even unclassified documents -- from the committee that we have asked for," he said. "Just last week, officials uniquely knowledgeable about the CIA [secret detention] program were prevented from meeting with the committee staff to answer questions."

Hamilton and Roemer said the only weapon that senators can use to extract information from the White House is withholding money.

"If you want access to information that you can't get ... don't give them the money. You'll get access to the information," Hamilton told Rockefeller.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.