Dems pull Defense bill from 'mini-bus' spending package

House-Senate negotiators have decided to pull a $470 billion Defense spending bill out of a combined package with the Military Construction-Veterans Affairs and Labor-Health and Human Services bills.

House Appropriations Chairman David Obey, D-Wis., said he informed Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., of his plan late Wednesday night as a way to accommodate GOP concerns about trying to piggyback a $10 billion boost above President Bush's request for Labor-HHS funding on top of money for troops and veterans' benefits.

Obey said he made the proposal "in the spirit of compromise" and that he hoped Republicans would come their way on increased Labor-HHS funds in response. Republicans said the back and forth represented Democratic mismanagement.

"It shows again trying to legislate without a real plan," said House Minority Whip Roy Blunt, R-Mo.

The move also came in response to concerns among anti-war House Democrats about the combined package, as additional funds for protective equipment for troops serving in Iraq and Afghanistan were to be included. Negotiators agreed to shave the proposed figure by about half, limiting war-related funds to $11 billion solely to purchase additional mine-resistant, ambush-protected vehicles, but there were still objections.

The measure includes just the Labor-HHS and Military Construction-VA measures, for a total of about $215.5 billion -- about 70 percent less than the original package.

Republicans still oppose combining even the two smaller bills, arguing it will delay the Military Construction-VA bill, which enjoys broad support. "By lashing these two bills together, we ensure their demise," said House Labor-HHS Appropriations Subcommittee ranking member James Walsh, R-N.Y.

Senate Republicans offered a motion to split the bills, but it failed on a party-line vote.

However, Senate Military Construction-VA Appropriations Subcommittee ranking member Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, said Republicans in that chamber would likely lodge a point of order against including "airdropped" matters, items not included in the underlying bill as passed by the House or Senate. That would require Democrats to muster 60 votes to keep the package together, or the Military Construction-VA bill would be broken off the underlying Labor-HHS measure.

Senate GOP leaders are circulating a letter urging Democrats to keep the measures separate, which has 44 signatures thus far, more than enough to sustain a point of order.

"This bill is going to run into huge obstacles. I don't think it will get through the Senate," Hutchison said.

Obey responded that if that were the case, then Republicans who voted to break the bills apart would "bear responsibility" for delaying veterans' health funds.

President Bush urged Congress to finish the Military Construction-VA and Defense spending bills, but he again threatened to veto the measures if they are combined with the Labor-HHS bill.

"When it comes to funding our troops, some in Washington should spend more time responding to the warnings of terrorists like Osama bin Laden and the requests of our commanders on the ground, and less time responding to the demands of bloggers and Code Pink protesters," he said.

Christian Bourge and Keith Koffler contributed to this report.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.