'Brusque' State IG denies making partisan decisions

A self-styled change agent, State Department Inspector General Howard Krongard admitted to lawmakers Wednesday that he tried to turn around his office in part through harsh confrontations with underperforming employees.

"I have been brusque and I have been shrill and I have been hard on people," he told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Current and former members of his staff have painted Krongard as a nightmare boss who humiliated career investigators and made employees fear coming to work. Some have accused Krongard of impeding investigations that might have embarrassed the Bush administration. And like other appointees trying to overhaul government agencies, Krongard has been under congressional scrutiny, fueled in part by staff discontent.

At Wednesday's committee hearing, Krongard acknowledged his lack of public sector experience caused problems in his handling to government employees. But Krongard, appointed in 2005, argued he is the victim of disgruntled underperformers who resisted change, including some officials he pushed out of the office. He said limited funds and low confidence in some staffers guided his decisions on investigations.

"I never impeded any investigation," he said. "Without getting into specifics ... suffice it to say there are many times when experience and capabilities, benefits to be achieved, likelihood of success, availability of other investigative bodies to do the same work, available resources ... and possibly conflicting parallel proceedings have to be weighed."

Krongard agreed with committee Republicans who faulted House Oversight and Goverment Reform Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., for publicizing what they called unsubstantiated charges. In interviews quoted in a Republican staff report, a number of Krongard's employees said they felt he blocked investigations to protect the administration, but none said they had evidence of his motives. Democrats, however, released their own report detailing a series of instances where Krongard, whatever his motives, made questionable decisions that were later criticized by his top staff and investigators at other agencies.

Waxman said Krongard stopped his investigators from assisting a Justice Department investigation into alleged weapons smuggling by security contractor Blackwater USA while not disclosing that his brother, former CIA Executive Director Alvin (Buzzy) Krongard, was on Blackwater Worldwide's advisory board. A Justice Department official said Krongard's actions "have certainly impacted the investigation," the Democrats' report notes.

Krongard said he delayed the investigation because his office was already cooperating on a separate, related probe into Blackwater and he feared conflicts between separate civil and criminal investigations. He said he did not believe his brother was on the company's board and that, in any case, that would not influence his decisions. But the committee, in response, released a Sept. 5 e-mail from Blackwater CEO Erik Prince to Buzzy Krongard and others. It states: "Thank you for accepting the invitation to be a member of the Blackwater Worldwide Advisory Board." After conferring with staff, Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., told Howard Krongard that his brother, as of Wednesday's hearing, was among scheduled attendees at a Blackwater conference in Virginia.

After a recess, Krongard said he had confirmed his brother was, in fact, on the advisory board. Krongard then said he would immediately recuse himself from Blackwater-related matters. Late in the hearing, Democrats shifted the focus of their allegations, dropping references to political motives. "We're not questioning your motivation, we're questioning your competence," Waxman said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.