Senator renews attacks on GSA chief

Senate Finance Committee ranking member Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, said Wednesday that the head of the General Services Administration inappropriately interfered with contract negotiations with an information technology company and may have made up allegations that employees in the agency's inspector general's office used intimidating tactics.

In a speech on the Senate floor, Grassley said his charges are detailed in two reports sent to the White House, congressional oversight committees and GSA. He said he could not release the reports publicly due to proprietary and legal issues.

GSA did not respond to requests for comment.

Grassley repeated charges that GSA Administrator Lurita Doan engaged in back-channel communications with Sun Microsystems while GSA contract officers were in heated negotiations with the company over renewal of a long-term deal.

Sun faced allegations it defrauded the government by overcharging during the contract's initial years.

Documents cited by Grassley and the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee show Doan told her staff that losing the Sun contract would hurt GSA financially.

The agency, which negotiates government-wide contracts with vendors, gets most of its budget from fees other agencies pay to buy from GSA schedules. Critics say that arrangement causes GSA to value contract volume over price.

After Doan expressed concerns, officials under her helped remove two contract officers who opposed renewing Sun's contract from the negotiations.

The third officer quickly made concessions critics say amounted to a bad deal for the government, a charge GSA strongly denies. Citing pressure from Grassley, Sun last month canceled the contract.

Grassley's charges culminate nearly a year of criticism he has leveled at Doan. His staff began questioning agency officials after reports last year that she tried to limit the budget of GSA Inspector General Brian Miller during a dispute over contract audits.

Witnesses have said Doan once privately compared IG employees to terrorists. Publicly, she has said they often intimidated agency employees and contractors through aggressive tactics.

Sun has made similar charges. In an Aug. 9 response to a Justice Department lawsuit, Sun said IG officials who negotiated with the company showed "animus."

An IG official in 2006 said Sun "would never receive another government contract" if its negotiators did not accept GSA's terms, Sun claims.

But Grassley Wednesday said Doan provided little evidence in response to his invitation to substantiate her claims about IG employees. He said just one example was brought to his attention.

"My staff could find no evidence to support those allegations," he said. "Sadly, it appears as if that one specific allegation may have been fabricated to cover intense top-down pressure on the contract officer to award a contract."

The Sun charges are among a series of issues raised against Doan, a President Bush appointee, by Grassley and Democratic legislators.

In June, the independent Office of Special Counsel sent Bush a report recommending Doan be fired for violating the Hatch Act, which bars using federal resources for partisan politics. The White House has not responded.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.