IG says he cannot afford to open probes in Iraq

Embattled State Department Inspector General Howard Krongard is starting to defend himself against charges that he blocked investigations into department activities in Iraq and Afghanistan to spare the Bush administration bad news.

Employees in Krongard's office charge that he prevented investigators from traveling to Iraq and Afghanistan to look into contract fraud and blocked them from cooperating with the Justice Department in other sensitive investigations. The accusations are the subject of inquiries by the President's Council on Integrity and Efficiency, a group of senior IGs and the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, which has set a Nov. 14 hearing on the matter.

In an interview Tuesday night with CongressDaily, Krongard, citing legal advice, declined to comment specifically on the charges against him. He suggested his actions were generally guided by cost concerns.

With flat budgets and an investigative staff of a maximum of 22 employees based in the Washington area, Krongard said could not afford to pay for overseas travel where the likelihood of a successful investigation was low. Echoing statements Tuesday by his attorney, Barbara Van Gelder of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Krongard said that 85 percent of the IG office's budget goes to personnel costs, with most of the remainder dedicated to a mandated inspection regime of overseas posts.

Without a budget increase and with rising travel costs, there is little left in his discretionary budget for open-ended investigations, said Krongard, a Bush appointee who was confirmed in 2005.

"When you have something really, really important you try to find a way to rob Peter to pay Paul. ... But the overall amount [discretionary money available] is very small," Krongard said. He added that each potential investigation requires close consideration of whether it is worth the cost. Such concerns applied especially to duplicative investigations or those that involve supporting other agencies' investigations, Krongard said.

His comments came in response to a Government Accountability Office report on the State Department IG's office that was a subject of a House Foreign Affairs Oversight Subcommittee hearing Wednesday afternoon. In testimony prepared for the hearing, Comptroller General David Walker, who heads GAO, questioned the independence of the State IG's office, but attributes the problem to longstanding issues with the organization of the office and rules that limit the IG's discretion.

"We continue to identify concerns regarding the independence of the State IG that are similar to concerns we reported almost three decades ago," Walker said in his prepared remarks. While State's budget swelled from $13.7 billion in fiscal 2001 to $24 billion in fiscal 2006, the IG's budget barely budged, increasing from $29 million to $31 million, Walker said.

GAO has recommended Krongard reduce use of career Foreign Service officers and State Department management staffers to fill positions in the office. Krongard in the interview and a written response, said he understood those recommendations but felt they went to too far. He accepted other GAO suggestions.

Walker said Krongard's responses "defend the status quo and indicate an inadequate concern and regard for the independence necessary to provide effective oversight of the department." Walker added that the effectiveness of the IG's office is limited by a lack of resources and a "lack of an appearance of independence," among other problems.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

    Download
  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

    Download
  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

    Download
  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

    Download
  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.