Working group to stay mum on FDA consolidation plan

The Food and Drug Administration's plan to consolidate field offices and laboratories remains suspended after the release of an interagency group's initial report on import safety.

FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach put the consolidation plan on hold Aug. 1, saying the agency wanted to consider the recommendations of the Working Group on Import Safety, a Cabinet-level panel created by President Bush, before moving forward. The reorganization would close seven of the agency's 13 food and pharmaceutical testing laboratories and four field offices. The working group's initial report, released Monday, generally recommended a wider focused risk-based approach to import safety but did not address the consolidation plan. According to an FDA spokeswoman, the group's final action plan, to be released in November, will not discuss the reorganization either.

"The working group will not be addressing FDA's consolidation plan," the spokeswoman said.

Without an endorsement, or even an assessment, from the working group, the FDA will likely face staunch resistance if it decides to move forward with the controversial plan. The National Treasury Employees Union, representing FDA employees, has criticized the strategy, calling it misguided and unjustified. Members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee have been critical of any moves to cut the number of food safety analysts amid high-profile instances of food contamination and recall. Both chambers of Congress included language in their fiscal 2008 Agriculture Department spending bills that would restrict laboratory closings.

"The FDA proposal to close more than half of its labs and reorganize its district offices caused nationwide outcry," NTEU President Colleen Kelley said. "Not only was the public alarmed by the threat the proposal caused to the food safety network, but Congress was outraged as well."

Nonetheless, FDA maintained that the plan remains only temporarily suspended and that officials will use this time to reassess it and to see how it could fit in with the working group's general recommendations.

"The suspension will allow [the Office of Regulatory Affairs] to consider the field structure, new tools, systems and other investments necessary to address recommendations that may come from the president's interagency Working Group on Import Safety," the spokeswoman said.

Kelley said with public and congressional opinion turned against the reorganization, FDA should throw in the towel.

"It is time for the FDA to stop insisting that this is a temporary suspension," Kelley said. "FDA employees deserve better than having their top agency officials continue to hold out the threat that the agency may still try and move forward with a plan that is unwelcome by the American public and by Congress."

Kelley said the FDA should instead invest in its workforce in order to strengthen its ability to keep the food supply safe.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.