Lawyer for GSA chief argues investigative agency is biased

The objectivity of the office investigating potential Hatch Act violations by General Services Administration chief Lurita Doan has been "irreparably damaged" by leaks of a report on preliminary findings to the media, Doan's lawyer argued Thursday.

In a two-page letter sent late Thursday evening to Special Counsel Scott Bloch, Michael Nardotti Jr., counsel to Doan, said the Office of Special Counsel should "disapprove the current report and support any further consideration of this matter by an investigative body outside the Office of Special Counsel."

The report found that Doan violated the Hatch Act, which limits on-the-job political activity of federal employees. She has until June 1 to respond, after which OSC will send a final report to President Bush. But Nardotti, a lawyer at Patton Boggs LLP in Washington, said Doan's team would "pursue alternative disposition of this matter with the Office of the President."

OSC spokesman Jim Mitchell said the agency would not comment on the letter.

The investigation focused on Doan's role in a Jan. 26 meeting at GSA headquarters where Scott Jennings, special assistant to the president and a deputy of political adviser Karl Rove, showed a 28-slide PowerPoint presentation to more than 30 GSA political appointees that analyzed the results of the 2006 mid-term election and prospects for the 2008 elections.

"The fact that some version of the report is now in the hands of at least three major media outlets leads to the very reasonable conclusion that this is not simply a case of one person providing a copy of the report to a favored journalist," Nardotti said in the letter. "It appears to be [a] carefully planned campaign to cause maximum damage to Ms. Doan."

The letter stated that it would be "beyond reason" to conclude that the leak came from a source outside OSC.

"The obligation to maintain the confidentiality of the report lies with your office and ultimately with you as the special counsel," the letter stated. "The gross and inexcusable failure to prevent the release of the report is extraordinarily unfair to Administrator Doan and has compromised the integrity of the process."

Nardotti noted that there were two versions of the report cited in the press. The earlier one, obtained by The Washington Post and dated May 17, recommended that President Bush "take disciplinary action" against Doan. This was changed to "appropriate action" in the version dated May 18.

"The leak of the May 17th version -- clearly a draft -- is particularly egregious," the letter stated. "It evidences a malicious effort by someone on your staff to seriously disparage Administrator Doan publicly -- perhaps before she even received the report -- but certainly before she had any meaningful opportunity to respond."

Elaine Kaplan, Bloch's predecessor as special counsel, said she was surprised to see the OSC report on the Post's Web site since it is OSC policy not to make its investigative reports available to the public, especially in an un-redacted format.

The chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Thursday asked Doan to testify regarding statements she made during the OSC investigation. The chairman, Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., said he was concerned about her allegations that employees who testified about her statements at the Jan. 26 meeting were biased and poor performers.

Doan received Waxman's request and is reviewing it, a GSA spokeswoman said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.