House panel puts new limits on job competitions

The House Armed Services Committee on Wednesday approved provisions that would place new limits on efforts to put jobs at the Defense Department and other agencies up for competition from private firms.

Panel members passed an amendment to the fiscal 2008 Defense authorization act (H.R. 1585) sponsored by Rep. Nancy Boyda, D-Kan., that would give Defense officials discretion in deciding whether to recompete work that remains in-house following a public-private competition.

The measure also would push the department to develop guidance on insourcing, or switching work from a contractor to civilian federal employees. The fiscal 2006 authorization act had a similar requirement, and panel members approved an incentive for the department to comply by prohibiting new competitions under the Office of Management and Budget's Circular A-76 until the guidance is published.

In a provision addressing a long-standing grievance of federal labor unions, the bill would expand protest rights so any elected representative of employees affected by a competition could file a challenge, rather than just the agency official designated as responsible for the in-house bid.

The measure also would prevent contractors from gaining a cost advantage by offering health or retirement benefits cheaper than those provided to federal employees. The health-related condition has been included in past appropriations bills, while the retirement component passed in the Senate appropriations language last year, but was ultimately stripped out in conference negotiations. If the measures are included in the final authorization act they will become permanent law, rather than expiring at the end of the fiscal year with spending provisions.

One ambitious provision in the 2008 authorization measure would restrict OMB from influencing Defense decisions to conduct competitions, while another would suspend all ongoing Defense competitions and require a new assessment of whether to continue each one.

Defense officials would be obligated to catalog the work done by contractors, and a new analysis would be required assessing any potential savings from restructuring processes other than public-private competitions.

In addition, under the measure all agencies must notify Congress of their intention to announce a competition.

On Thursday, the American Federation of Government Employees and the National Federation of Federal Employees welcomed passage of the amendment, which AFGE described in a statement as "ambitious and comprehensive."

Over each of the past several years, the House has passed language to completely block competitive sourcing in some civilian agencies, but such provisions have been taken out during House-Senate conference negotiations.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.