OMB Director: Shutdown Consequences Have Been ‘Blown Out of Proportion’

House Speaker Paul Ryan of Wis. left, and White House budget director Mick Mulvaney arrive for a meeting on Capitol Hill in March. House Speaker Paul Ryan of Wis. left, and White House budget director Mick Mulvaney arrive for a meeting on Capitol Hill in March. AP Photo/Alex Brandon

Lawmakers have a little more than two weeks to reach an agreement on how to fund government and avoid a shutdown, though President Trump’s budget director is shrugging off such an outcome as inconsequential.

Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney advocated for a government shutdown as “good policy” during his time in Congress. Even during his confirmation process, Mulvaney said in written testimony he still believed that to be the case. The former congressman has changed his tune to some degree, but still argues that an appropriations lapse would be inconsequential.

“Shutdown is never a desired end,” Mulvaney told CNBC on Wednesday. He said he thought the odds of one happening were “very low.” Agencies have not yet begun preparing for a shutdown and the budget director said he sees no need for them to do so. The most recent OMB guidance mandates the agency hold a teleconference with government leaders to instruct them to review and update their shutdown plans one week prior to a potential appropriations lapse.

Mulvaney added that if a shutdown were to occur, about 83 percent of government dollars would still go out the door.

“Social Security checks go out, military still exists,” he said. “The FBI still chases bad guys. I think the consequences have been blown out of proportion.”

While leadership on both sides of the aisle in Congress have maintained they have no interest in shutting down the government and said negotiators are working toward an omnibus bill to fund agencies through September, the White House has left the door open for shuttering agencies by insisting that lawmakers pay for Trump’s priorities such as the wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. Last week, Mulvaney told Real Clear Politics, “What we’re focusing on is simply getting our priorities funded.”

Trump has asked for an extra $30 billion for the Defense Department to spend by Sept. 30—the end of fiscal 2017—and $3 billion for the Homeland Security Department. The DHS money would go toward the wall and a ramp up in border security and immigration enforcement. Democrats have threatened to shut down the government if the spending bill includes appropriations for those issues. Senate Republicans appear to have capitulated to the threat, indicating they would deal with the administration’s supplemental request separately from the regular appropriations bill.

In March, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer rejected the idea that keeping government open and funding the president’s priorities were “mutually exclusive.”

“Obviously, we don’t want the government to shut down, “ Spicer said, “but we want to make sure that we’re funding the priorities of the government.”

And if a shutdown does occur, the White House is already looking to defer blame.

“It takes three to tango, the House, the Senate and the White House,” Mulvaney told NBC. “And if they can't agree, you have a lapse in funding.”

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.