VA Fires Senior Exec in Pittsburgh Over Legionnaires’ Outbreak

Pittsburgh VA hospital Pittsburgh VA hospital Keith Srakocic/AP file photo

The Veterans Affairs Department on Thursday fired a senior executive in charge of the department’s health care system in Pittsburgh, making her the fourth top career official to leave the VA since August.

Terry Gerigk Wolf, who served as director of the VA’s Pittsburgh Healthcare System for seven years, was removed for “conduct unbecoming of a senior executive and wasteful spending.” Six veterans died and 16 others became ill from an outbreak in 2011 and 2012 of Legionnaires’ disease in Pittsburgh. Wolf was placed on paid administrative leave in June pending an investigation by VA’s new Office of Accountability Review.

“This removal action underscores VA’s commitment to hold leaders accountable and get veterans the care they need,” the department said in a statement. Dr. David Macpherson was named acting director of the Pittsburgh Veterans Healthcare system while the department looks for a new director.

Since Aug. 7, when President Obama signed the 2014 Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act, two senior executives have been removed under the new law’s provisions making it easier to fire top career officials. Two others retired before they could be fired by the department. But several lawmakers have criticized the department for dragging its feet to fire employees involved in the VA scandal related to data manipulation and excessive delays in scheduling doctors’ appointments for veterans. 

The new law allows the department to fire and demote Senior Executive Service employees immediately, with paychecks getting cut off the day of the termination. The affected executive would then have seven days to issue an appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board, which in turn would have 21 days for an expedited adjudication. MSPB’s ruling would be final. However, the department currently is giving affected employees five days’ notice of removal, which some Republicans at a House Veterans’ Affairs Committee hearing on Thursday said amounts to another appeals period.

“These questionable actions are nowhere to be found in the law that we wrote and the president signed,” said Chairman Jeff Miller, R-Fla., to VA Deputy Secretary Sloan Gibson during the hearing.

Gibson defended the department’s approach to removing employees for misconduct and poor performance. “The objective behind our process, this removal process, is for VA removal actions to withstand appeal,” Gibson said. “If our actions fail to meet the preponderance of evidence standards that the MSPB has established, or failed to provide the due process expected under case law, the Merit Systems Protection Board will simply overturn the decision, order the employee returned to their position, and direct that their back pay and legal costs be awarded. That would not be what’s right for veterans or for taxpayers.”

Approximately 1,000 employees are under review for possible removal related to poor performance, but not necessarily connected to the data manipulation scandal or the outbreak of Legionnaires’ disease in Pittsburgh.

Miller on Thursday called the removal of Wolf “a positive step” but also said the department “still has a lot to learn about honesty, integrity and accountability.” The Florida Republican also questioned why it took two years after the outbreak ended to fire Wolf, saying the VA “was only driven to this point after intense congressional and media scrutiny.”

Miller said Wolf wasn’t the only VA official involved in the Legionnaires’ outbreak who needed to be held accountable. “Wolf’s boss collected a $63,000 bonus days after the inspector general attributed the outbreak to mismanagement and VA recently promoted Wolf’s deputy even though internal emails provide smoking-gun evidence he tried to hide the outbreak from the public.”

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.