Medicare Could Do More to Stop Duplicate Payments to Providers

Goncharuk Maksim/

Medicare managers’ ongoing efforts to avoid duplicate payments to health care providers could benefit from improvements to post-payment reviews by contractors, a recent audit found.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services “does not have sufficient information to determine whether its contractors are conducting inappropriate duplicative claims reviews” due to inadequate data monitoring, the Government Accountability Office said in a recently released report completed in July.

Medicare fraud is a key contributor to the governmentwide improper payments estimated at $1.6 billion annually. Auditors sampled contractor reviews of 1.4 million claims by hospitals, doctors, laboratories, skilled nursing services, home care providers and ambulance services in 2012.

To identify suspicious claims and estimate error rates, four types of review contractors  select claims, request documentation from providers to support Medicare coverage of those claims, apply Medicare coverage and coding requirements to determine if the claims were paid properly and communicate the results of their reviews to the providers.

Though progress is evident and guidance has been formulated, the main CMS “database was not designed to provide information on all possible duplication, and its data are not reliable because other postpayment contractors did not consistently enter information about their reviews,” GAO found. “CMS has not provided sufficient oversight of these data or issued complete guidance to contractors on avoiding duplicative claims.”

Because of inconsistent approaches by contractors, GAO also found that correspondence with providers often lacks key information that allows those providers to contest any alleged overpayments.

GAO recommended that CMS take provide “additional oversight and guidance regarding data, duplicative reviews and contractor correspondence.” The Health and Human Services Department, on reviewing a draft of the report, largely agreed.

(Image via Goncharuk Maksim/

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.