How Agencies Can ‘Get the Most Out of Strategic Reviews’


To succeed in today’s data-driven performance environment, agency leaders must direct sustained attention to goals while encouraging two-way communication with staff, according to a study to be released on Wednesday.

“Getting the Most Out of Strategic Reviews,” a summary of a January forum held by the Office of Management and Budget and the National Academy of Public Administration, is designed to give agencies “more practical advice on what constitutes a successful, impactful strategic review,” says its introduction.

Under OMB Circular A-11, as updated by the 2010 Government Performance and Results Modernization Act, agencies are required to use results of data-driven strategic reviews of goals and objectives to “inform strategic decision-making, budget formulation, and near-term agency actions, as well as preparation of the Annual Performance Plan and Annual Performance Report,” the study noted. That process “helps agency leaders develop a broad foundation of evidence and data in order to prioritize policy and budgetary decision-making” as well as “incentivize communities of learning and the sharing of promising practices.”

The January conference, with corporate sponsorship, drew attendees from the Government Accountability Office and the multi-agency Performance Improvement Council, along with several departments, including Housing and Urban Development, Labor and Agriculture. Also contributing were NASA, private sector consultants and representatives of local government and academia.

Among the lessons learned were that discussion during strategic reviews “should focus on those issues most important to leadership” to ensure that leadership remains committed and the project is taken seriously throughout the organization.

“Reviews should include all relevant decision makers and must be interactive, not a series of presentations,” the report recommended. “The focus should be on what needs to be decided.”

Program evaluation and budget processes should be integrated into the strategic reviews, with relevant officials participating. “Because no organization achieves its objectives on its own, strategic reviews should consider all contributors to a goal and ensure they are integrated into the performance management process, if not the meeting itself,” the group agreed.

“Agencies must ensure data is reliable enough to drive decision making,” the report said. “Additionally, before going to great lengths to correct data quality issues or collect new data, agencies should look for other sources of data that haven’t been thought of to fill gaps in what is not known.”

Performance and evidence “will rarely be the only factors driving decision making,” the report cautioned, and, because strategic reviews should not be “punitive, those whose goals are being reviewed should be provided questions or issues in advance, to the extent possible.” Data and strategic review meetings should be posted on an agency internal website, with meetings held, when practicable, at regular times and locations, the report said.

(Image via bloomua/

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.