No, the VA Is Not an Obamacare Preview

Matt York/AP

As if it wasn't bad enough that dozens of veterans may have died because of the VA system's failures, some conservative pundits are turning the fear factor up a notch: This is what awaits us all under Obamacare, they claim.

That's nonsense.

The health care system that the Veterans Affairs Department administers (or fails to administer) has almost nothing in common with the Affordable Care Act. No matter what specific series of failures led to the VA scandal, and even if Obamacare goes horribly, it would take enormous leaps of logic to connect the two.

Not that needing enormous leaps of logic has ever stopped an anti-Obamacare talking point before.

"This is going to be the VA on steroids … much, much worse," conservative icon Ben Carson—who is a doctor—said in an interview on Fox Business. "Without question," people will die under Obamacare, just as veterans allegedly died because of the VA's mismanagement, Carson said.

"The real problem is not management," the New York Post editorial board wrote last week. "The real problem is government-provided health care.… If the government can't even make such a system work for our vets, what makes anyone think it will work for the rest of us?"

If you want to argue that the VA's problems are a sign of what happens under true government control of a health care system, well, there's an argument to be made there. Some of the problems at the VA—namely, long waits to see certain doctors—are similar to the biggest complaints about other socialized or quasi-socialized health care systems, including the UK's.

And the VA is about as socialized as it gets: The federal government owns the hospitals, employs the doctors who work in those hospitals, and finances the coverage that veterans use to get care.

Obamacare, though, is not socialized medicine. It's not a government takeover of the health care system. Sure, people call it that, and in comparison with charges like "death panels," those characterizations don't sound so off-the-reservation. But they're still wrong.

Most people accessing the health care system through Obamacare will do so by purchasing private insurance through the law's exchanges. The federal government regulates those insurance policies and requires them to cover certain services. The vast majority of exchange customers also receive subsidies, funded by the government in the form of tax credits, to help pay for their premiums. So it's not like the government isn't involved at all.

But, unlike with the VA, no one on the exchanges is buying insurance from the government; it's all private coverage. The government doesn't decide how much that coverage costs. It doesn't employ doctors, or decide how much they'll get paid, or require them to accept any of the insurance plans sold through the exchanges. "Obamacare" is not a health care system. The VA is.

Obamacare also expands eligibility for Medicaid, which is a government-run program. But it's still not socialized medicine like the VA: You don't use your Medicaid card to go to the Medicaid hospital for an appointment with the Medicaid doctor, the way veterans do with their VA coverage.

"If the GOP can't find the courage to enact fundamental reforms of the VA, it has no right to complain about Obamacare," conservative health care expert Avik Roy wrote in a blog post that suggests moving veterans into Obamacare's exchanges.

The structure within the VA that allowed long backlogs to develop and, allegedly, allowed workers to create secret, off-the-books waiting lists, is a structure that has a lot to do with the specifics of that system.

Private insurance doesn't create backwards incentives to trap patients in an endless appeals process, the way the VA apparently does. Plans sold through the exchanges offer different levels of benefits and different networks of doctors; the VA is the VA. The VA is a unique system with specific flaws. Its problems don't simply photocopy themselves onto the private insurance market just because they're both health care systems.

And yet …

"You're going to see this is really what the rest of you all are going to get: One big fat VA system in the form of Obamacare," Fox News host Kimberly Guilfoyle said last week.

Her cohost, Eric Bolling, went further and tried to extrapolate, based on the accusations about the VA, precisely how many people Obamacare would kill.

"If people are dying, how many people are going to die in Obamacare? Do the math. It will be about 500 people per year that are going to die waiting—apples to apples—500 people will die on Obamacare" Bolling said.

Nope.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

    Download
  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

    Download
  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

    Download
  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

    Download
  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.