No, the VA Is Not an Obamacare Preview

Matt York/AP

As if it wasn't bad enough that dozens of veterans may have died because of the VA system's failures, some conservative pundits are turning the fear factor up a notch: This is what awaits us all under Obamacare, they claim.

That's nonsense.

The health care system that the Veterans Affairs Department administers (or fails to administer) has almost nothing in common with the Affordable Care Act. No matter what specific series of failures led to the VA scandal, and even if Obamacare goes horribly, it would take enormous leaps of logic to connect the two.

Not that needing enormous leaps of logic has ever stopped an anti-Obamacare talking point before.

"This is going to be the VA on steroids … much, much worse," conservative icon Ben Carson—who is a doctor—said in an interview on Fox Business. "Without question," people will die under Obamacare, just as veterans allegedly died because of the VA's mismanagement, Carson said.

"The real problem is not management," the New York Post editorial board wrote last week. "The real problem is government-provided health care.… If the government can't even make such a system work for our vets, what makes anyone think it will work for the rest of us?"

If you want to argue that the VA's problems are a sign of what happens under true government control of a health care system, well, there's an argument to be made there. Some of the problems at the VA—namely, long waits to see certain doctors—are similar to the biggest complaints about other socialized or quasi-socialized health care systems, including the UK's.

And the VA is about as socialized as it gets: The federal government owns the hospitals, employs the doctors who work in those hospitals, and finances the coverage that veterans use to get care.

Obamacare, though, is not socialized medicine. It's not a government takeover of the health care system. Sure, people call it that, and in comparison with charges like "death panels," those characterizations don't sound so off-the-reservation. But they're still wrong.

Most people accessing the health care system through Obamacare will do so by purchasing private insurance through the law's exchanges. The federal government regulates those insurance policies and requires them to cover certain services. The vast majority of exchange customers also receive subsidies, funded by the government in the form of tax credits, to help pay for their premiums. So it's not like the government isn't involved at all.

But, unlike with the VA, no one on the exchanges is buying insurance from the government; it's all private coverage. The government doesn't decide how much that coverage costs. It doesn't employ doctors, or decide how much they'll get paid, or require them to accept any of the insurance plans sold through the exchanges. "Obamacare" is not a health care system. The VA is.

Obamacare also expands eligibility for Medicaid, which is a government-run program. But it's still not socialized medicine like the VA: You don't use your Medicaid card to go to the Medicaid hospital for an appointment with the Medicaid doctor, the way veterans do with their VA coverage.

"If the GOP can't find the courage to enact fundamental reforms of the VA, it has no right to complain about Obamacare," conservative health care expert Avik Roy wrote in a blog post that suggests moving veterans into Obamacare's exchanges.

The structure within the VA that allowed long backlogs to develop and, allegedly, allowed workers to create secret, off-the-books waiting lists, is a structure that has a lot to do with the specifics of that system.

Private insurance doesn't create backwards incentives to trap patients in an endless appeals process, the way the VA apparently does. Plans sold through the exchanges offer different levels of benefits and different networks of doctors; the VA is the VA. The VA is a unique system with specific flaws. Its problems don't simply photocopy themselves onto the private insurance market just because they're both health care systems.

And yet …

"You're going to see this is really what the rest of you all are going to get: One big fat VA system in the form of Obamacare," Fox News host Kimberly Guilfoyle said last week.

Her cohost, Eric Bolling, went further and tried to extrapolate, based on the accusations about the VA, precisely how many people Obamacare would kill.

"If people are dying, how many people are going to die in Obamacare? Do the math. It will be about 500 people per year that are going to die waiting—apples to apples—500 people will die on Obamacare" Bolling said.

Nope.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.