The 10 Public Housing Authority Officials Paid the Most from Federal Coffers

The top two positions on the list came from the Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta, Georgia. The top two positions on the list came from the Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta, Georgia. Rudy Balasko/Shutterstock.com

The Housing and Urban Development Department reported on May 16 that 100 percent of public housing authorities complied with a congressionally-mandated executive salary cap in 2013. PHAs -- which are state and locally-run entities that receive a significant amount of federal funding -- were prohibited in fiscal years 2012 and 2013 from using federal Section 8 and Section 9 funds to pay the salaries of their top officials in excess of $155,500. Lawmakers extended the prohibition in the fiscal 2014 HUD appropriations law, and the current cap is $157,100, based on Level IV of the Executive Schedule pay scale.

In the current statute, however, the cap does not cover total cash compensation. So, some top PHA officials earned more than $155,500 last year in federally-funded salary and bonus because of a loophole in the law. Below is a list of who received the most compensation (salary and bonus) from Section 8 and Section 9 funds at the country’s PHAs in 2013. This list does not necessarily include the highest-paid PHA jobs in the country, many of which use a mix of funding streams to compensate employees. We’ve listed the total compensation including federal and non-federal funds for certain positions where applicable, if the person received more money on top of compensation from the federal coffers.

The highest-paid PHA executive in 2013 was the city manager of the Santa Monica Housing Authority, who received a total compensation of $353,484 (salary, no bonus). That figure does not include any Section 8 or Section 9 funds.

Top Federally-Funded Compensation in 2013 Paid to Public Housing Authority Executives

  1. $218,750 – Chief Finance Officer, Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta, Georgia. The total compensation for this position in 2013, including federal and non-federal funds, was $305,350.
  2. $200,750 – Interim President and CEO, Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta, Georgia. The total compensation for this position in 2013, including federal and non-federal funds, was $306,350.
  3. $197,989 – Executive Director, Housing Authority of the Borough of Lodi, New Jersey
  4. $195,639 – CEO, Guttenberg Housing Authority, New Jersey
  5. $181,769 – Executive Director, Housing Authority of Baltimore City
  6. $178,070 – Acting Executive Director, Housing Authority of the City of Bradenton, Florida
  7. $175,430 – CEO, Corpus Christi Housing Authority, Texas
  8. $174,900 – Director of Capital Programs, D.C. Housing Authority. The total compensation for this position in 2013, including federal and non-federal funds, was $213,400.
  9. $171,142 – Executive Director, Housing Authority of the City of Augusta, Georgia. The total compensation for this position in 2013, including federal and non-federal funds, was $217,695.
  10. $166,510 – Executive Director, Housing Authority of the City of Bradenton, Florida. 

(Image via Rudy Balasko/Shutterstock.com)

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

    View
  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

    View
  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

    View
  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

    View
  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

    View
  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

    View
  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.

    View

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.