Former DHS Watchdog Who Got Too Cozy With Managers Is Put on Leave

Charles Edwards was removed from his interim post on the DHS science and technology staff following the release of a Senate report . Charles Edwards was removed from his interim post on the DHS science and technology staff following the release of a Senate report . Charles Dharapak/AP file photo

The need for watchdogs to operate independently of their agencies prompted a shakeup on Thursday at the Homeland Security Department inspector general’s office, resulting in a former IG being placed on leave.

Charles Edwards was removed from his interim post on the DHS science and technology staff following the release of a Senate report detailing his inappropriate socializing and sharing of draft documents with managers of the employees he was investigating. Edwards had been the subject of a yearlong probe by a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs subcommittee.

“The subcommittee found that Mr. Edwards jeopardized the independence of the OIG,” said the report on the investigation, led by Sens. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., and Ron Johnson, R-Wis, of the Financial and Contracting Oversight Subcommittee. Edwards had an “inadequate understanding of the importance of OIG independence” the report said. “Mr. Edwards did not obtain independent legal advice and directed reports to be altered or delayed to accommodate senior DHS officials. Mr. Edwards also did not recuse himself from audits and inspections that had a conflict of interest related to his wife’s employment.”

Edwards, an engineer with 20 years of federal experience, including stints at the Transportation Security Administration and the Postal Service, “socialized with senior D.H.S. officials outside of work over drinks and dinner,” the report said. “The subcommittee obtained emails where Mr. Edwards told the D.H.S. chief of staff that he truly valued his friendship and that his ‘support, guidance and friendship has helped me be successful this year.’ ”

Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, in placing Edwards on administrative leave Thursday, told reporters, “Other individuals who are apparently and allegedly implicated have already left DHS, and if additional information comes to light, I will continue to take appropriate action.”

Edwards was cleared of other allegations, such as abuse of government resources in travel and charges of nepotism, the subcommittee found. Allegations that he destroyed records and favored certain employees and retaliated against others were not substantiated, said the report, which was sent to the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency. “However, the subcommittee did find that there was a widespread belief that Mr. Edwards engaged in those actions and that belief contributed to an office environment characterized by low morale, fear, and general dissatisfaction with Mr. Edwards’ leadership,” the report stated.

Edwards resigned from the IG’s office in December on the eve of scheduled congressional testimony, and has since been replaced by John Roth.

The drama at the Homeland Security IG’s office has been followed closely by advocacy groups for government transparency and accountability. Danielle Brian, executive director of the Project on Government Oversight, which tracked the issue to highlight the role of whistleblowers in feeding information to the senators, told Government Executive on Friday, "We are seeing growing evidence that acting IGs should be removed from consideration for the permanent jobs at their agencies. Doing that would remove the incentive to improperly curry favor with the agency management they're supposed to be overseeing."

The nonprofit Cause of Action, which conducted its own two-year probe of Edwards, issued a statement noting that the inspectors general council continues to investigate his conduct. The group raised “concerns to President Obama about the destruction of records and complaints filed about his misconduct that would warrant Edwards’ removal from office and potential criminal liability,” it stated. “We know that the Office of Special Counsel forwarded at least one complaint about Edwards to CIGIE.”

Cause of Action sued the DHS IG office for failing to produce documents requested under the Freedom of Information Act. “This transparency failure is now costing time and resources in court for what could have been a simple compliance with FOIA,” the group said. “CIGIE should complete its investigation as expeditiously as possible and refer evidence of criminal conduct to the Department of Justice” given that Edwards is technically still a DHS manager.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.