Group Wants White House to Release Documents on Ambassadorial Nominees

Sarah Scully/ file photo

The union of retired Foreign Service officers, having threatened to sue the State Department under the Freedom of Information Act, has received information that it sought for sometimes-controversial Obama administration ambassadorial nominees. But it has decided that the White House should be the one to make the documents public.

The American Foreign Service Association in February joined the fray over nominees, whom some say were picked more for their donations to the Obama reelection campaign than their knowledge of the host country, by releasing long-in-the-works guidelines for improving the selection progress and raising the bar for selection of chiefs of mission overseas -- be they Foreign Service officers or private-sector professionals.

But the administration appeared to delay in processing the association’s July 2013 and February 2014 requests for what’s known as “certificates of competence” for all nominees. AFSA later expressed particular concern over the nominees picked to serve in Norway, Hungary and Argentina.

On March 5, AFSA’s governing board voted to instruct its general counsel to file suit in U.S. District Court to compel the State Department to release the certificates if it did not do so by the close of business on March 6. “AFSA calls on the State Department and the administration to make public all certificates of competence for chief of mission positions, consistent with the principles of openness, transparency and good governance,” the resolution stated. “Pending receipt of these certificates of competence, AFSA will send letters to the Senate and the White House expressing concern that the recent nominations for chief of mission positions in Norway, Hungary and Argentina appear to be based primarily on their status as financial contributors to political campaigns, which is in violation of the Foreign Service Act of 1980.”

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters on March 7 the department had fulfilled the first AFSA request from July 2013, but had not had time to process the second because the department receives as many as 18,000 FOIA requests annually. The day before, Psaki spoke to the controversy more broadly: “The administration looks for qualified candidates who represent Americans from all walks of life and who show true zeal for serving their country, and we’ve received interest and recruited talented people from all across the country and all kinds of professional backgrounds, whether they are Foreign Service -- they proceed through a different process, there, of course, but political appointees who may be from the business sector, who may be from a public service sector,” she said. “We feel that this kind of diversity helps represent who we are and the United States around the world.”

AFSA spokeswoman Kristen Fernekes told Government Executive that the group “actually wanted to get the documents -- we didn’t want to sue State. What we have been doing is reviewing them, and have actually continued conversations with the White House and Capitol Hill. We’re holding off on doing anything else while asking the White House to put them out.”

The association, she added, does not want its tactics to be seen as “an attack on some particular nominee or administration.” It wants the documents released as part of a process in which “we think everyone can benefit.”

Neither the White House nor the State Department would comment beyond Psaki’s March 7 remarks. 

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.