House Votes for Independent Study of New Regulations

House Republicans on Friday topped off their “Stop Government Abuse Week” by passing a years-in-the-works bill to require newly proposed federal regulations to be independently analyzed by entities such as the Congressional Budget Office to gauge their burden on businesses and state and local governments.

The Unfunded Mandates Information and Transparency Act (H.R. 899), which passed the House 234 to 176, drew a veto threat from the Office of Management and Budget, and is opposed by many in the environmental and workplace safety nonprofit community.

The bill’s prospects in the Senate are uncertain, like other bills the House approved this week calling for greater transparency and extra scrutiny of agency spending and rules.

“At the very least policymakers and unelected regulators should know the price of what they dictate,” said the bill’s chief sponsor Rep. Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., in a statement. The act “will help restore honesty and transparency to federal mandates and ensure Washington bureaucrats are held accountable for seeking public input and considering the negative consequences, in dollars and in jobs, prospective mandates will impose on the economy.”

Rep. James Lankford, R-Okla., said during floor debate, “This bill assumes one thing -- that regulators are human and not infallible. Whenever someone in Washington has a good idea, someone has to pay for it. This says they have to have consultation with the people affected.”

Rep. Joe Garcia, D-Fla., who opposed the bill, said, “Just as it is absurd to say all regulations are good, it is equally absurd to say all regulations are bad, as this bill does.”

The White House said the bill “would introduce needless uncertainty into agency decision-making and undermine the ability of agencies to provide critical public health and safety protections,” warning that it would “create needless grounds for judicial review” and slow down decision-making by adding “to the already robust analytical and procedural requirements of the rulemaking process.”

The liberal-leaning Public Citizen and an allied group of advocates called the Coalition for Sensible Safeguards wrote to lawmakers saying the Foxx bill and other legislation the House passed during “Stop Government Abuse Week” would “undermine our nation’s ability to set health, safety and environmental standards as well as new financial protections. Given that we have experienced multiple health and safety disasters in communities and workplaces across the country in recent years, it is the wrong time to thwart the progress of necessary public protections.”  

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.