Why the Spending Bill Would Ban Official Portraits

Charles Dharapak/AP

Fiscal conservatives didn't get everything they wanted in the 2014 spending bill, but they did win the battle over oil paintings.

It might be meaningless in the context of the $1.1 trillion omnibus bill revealed Tuesday, but one section of the bill would save money by banning the federal government from paying for paintings of the president, vice president, members of Congress, or other officials.

Those savings might be small compared with issues relating to the Affordable Care Act or the defense budget, but Cabinet heads have managed to spend a surprising amount on paintings in the past.

The federal government spent $180,000 on official portraits in 2012, according to a November 2012 review by The Washington Times. The Environmental Protection Agency spent nearly $40,000 on a portrait of then-Administrator Lisa Jackson; the Air Force spent $41,200 on a portrait of then-Secretary Michael Donley; and the Agriculture Department spent $22,500 on a portrait of Secretary Tom Vilsack, according to The Times investigation. Before Jackson's portrait, the EPA spent about $30,000 on a portrait of then-Secretary Stephen Johnson, the newspaper said.

And The Washington Post found in 2008 that most portrait contracts are awarded with no competitive bidding.

Expensive portraits drew opposition before the issue found its way into the spending bill. In April, Rep. Bill Cassidy, R-La., introduced the Eliminating Government-funded Oil painting (EGO) Act, which also would have prohibited federally funded portraits of certain officials.

It's worth eliminating those costs even if it doesn't make a noticeable dent in the budget, said Steve Ellis, spokesman for the watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense.

"At least it's showing a nod to some level of fiscal responsibility while we waste millions and billions elsewhere," Ellis said.

Portraits of the president, vice president, and other major political figures are understandable, but a nicely framed photograph should be enough for less influential officials, Ellis said.

And some federally funded portraits are located in secure areas of office buildings, off-limits to the public, adding to Ellis's belief that taxpayers should not pay for them.

As digital cameras become cheaper and even the president uses a phone to take selfies, the purpose of painted portraits has changed. Rather than simply documenting leaders of executive agencies, Ellis said they have become a lavish perk.

"There are very few people who could afford to pay for a portrait at all," Ellis said, "and times have changed."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.