Social Security Administration Asked to Improve Interagency Death List

Flickr user dumbeast

As the compiler of the death master list of Americans used by many agencies, the Social Security Administration could do more to reduce data errors and erroneous payments to deceased beneficiaries by clarifying the risks, Congress’ watchdog found.

“SSA lacks written guidelines other than the language in the [Social Security] Act for determining whether agencies are eligible under the act to access the full death file, and it does not share with agencies how it determines the reasonable cost of sharing the data, which recipients of the full file are required to reimburse SSA,” the Government Accountability Office wrote in a report released Dec. 27.

For decades the Social Security Administration has updated the death master list using information from state agencies and families, selling the data to other agencies such as the Internal Revenue Service and the Veterans Affairs Department. It also makes a shortened version available to the public through the Commerce Department’s National Technical Information Service.

But SSA currently verifies only the data needed to confirm eligibility for Social Security checks, and Congress is considering legislation to make full data available to a wider range of agencies.

“Federal benefit programs’ need for accurate administrative data, such as death information, is increasingly evident in an environment of continuing budget shortages, where improper payments due to inaccurate information cost taxpayers billions of dollars in fiscal year 2012,” GAO noted. “Because of its mission, SSA is uniquely positioned to collect and manage death data at the federal level.”

The agency doesn’t know how to address errors or provide other agencies with timely information “because SSA has never analyzed the risk posed by errors or processes that could result in errors,” GAO said.

In addition, SSA’s pricing is insufficiently transparent to ensure that all agencies negotiate similar terms for acquiring the data.

GAO recommended that SSA assess risks associated with inaccuracies; develop and publicize guidance it will use to determine agency access under the law; and share detailed reimbursement estimates.

SSA accepted most of the recommendations but balked at developing and publicizing guidance, stating that each request is unique and that “it is not a typical government business practice to share these detailed costs for reimbursable agreements.”

(Image via Flickr user dumbeast)

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

    Download
  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

    Download
  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

    Download
  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

    Download
  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.