GOP Lawmakers: Cut Fed Benefits, Not Defense Spending

Rep. Doug Lamborn, R-Colo., will introduce the Provide for the Common Defense Act along with Rep. Jim Bridenstine, R-Okla. Rep. Doug Lamborn, R-Colo., will introduce the Provide for the Common Defense Act along with Rep. Jim Bridenstine, R-Okla. Ed Andrieski/AP File Photo

A new Republican proposal unveiled Tuesday to offset sequestration’s impact on Defense Department spending would cut benefits to federal retirees and force current employees to contribute more to their pensions.

Reps. Jim Bridenstine, R-Okla., and Doug Lamborn, R-Colo., will introduce the Provide for the Common Defense Act in an effort to roll back the budget caps put into place by the 2011 Budget Control Act that have led to significant cuts at the Defense Department. The bill would generate other savings in part by using a less generous formula for inflation -- known as the chained Consumer Price Index -- to calculate cost-of-living adjustments for federal retirees and Social Security beneficiaries.

The legislation also would increase over three years federal employees’ contributions toward their retirement accounts from 0.8 percent of their salaries to 2 percent. Additionally, Bridenstine and Lamborn would eliminate the Federal Employees Retirement System annuity supplement, which provides extra benefits to certain employees who retire before they are eligible to collect Social Security.

All three proposals were endorsed by President Obama in his fiscal 2014 budget plan. Citing Obama’s budget and estimates by the Congressional Budget Office, the Republican lawmakers said the chained-CPI conversion would save $216 billion over 10 years, while the retirement contribution increase would save $20 billion in the next decade.

The bill would cancel the budget caps on the Defense side for the next two years, and ultimately save the government $200 billion in the next decade. In addition to the cuts to federal employee benefits, the bill would include Obama-budget provisions to cut Medicare benefits and crop subsidies. Obama has repeatedly said, however, he would only back these measures if they were coupled with new tax revenues.

Bridenstine said it is critical to continue investing in our national security to keep pace with other nations such as Russia and China.

“President Obama is hollowing out our military, emboldening our enemies to be even more aggressive, and encouraging our friends to align with the East,” Bridenstine said. “This bill strengthens defense, reforms entitlements and reduces the national deficit by $200 billion.”

Lamborn added Congress should not target the Defense Department as a means to bring down the nation’s debts.

“Congress needs to give our military relief rather than use it as a punching bag,” Lamborn said. “Even President Obama must realize that out-of-control entitlement spending is drowning our country in debt.”

Professional associations and unions representing federal employees and retirees, which blasted Obama’s budget when it was unveiled in April, have repeatedly condemned any effort to cut benefits as a part of a budget deal, saying their members have already sacrificed enough. 

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.