Administration Decided on Obamacare Delay in August, Emails Reveal

"As the paper trail broadens, we see more and more evidence that the administration was fully aware its signature health care law was not ready for prime time," Energy and Commerce Chairman Fred Upton, R-Mich., said. "As the paper trail broadens, we see more and more evidence that the administration was fully aware its signature health care law was not ready for prime time," Energy and Commerce Chairman Fred Upton, R-Mich., said. Evan Vucci/AP

Officials in the Obama administration had already decided they needed to delay new health insurance options for small businesses even as officials were testifying before Congress that the program would be ready, according to newly released internal emails.

The emails, released by Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, show that officials within the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services decided in August that they needed to delay part of a new insurance marketplace for small businesses.

"Guys, this is absolutely urgent and I need an answer on this today. If this is late we have to public announce we are late with a deliverable which means Marilyn Tavenner and the Secretary will have to announce," Monique Outerbridge, director of CMS's Office of Information Services, wrote on Aug. 6.

The delay was not publicly announced until Sept. 26—just days before the scheduled Oct. 1 launch. The administration has since decided to push back the online enrollment process until next year.

CMS said the emails released Friday only cover part of the decision-making process. Senior officials did not sign off on the final decision to partially delay the small-business exchange, known as SHOP, until mid-September, CMS said.

"The emails in question are between a small group of individuals involved in a broader decision-making process, and they reflect one piece of many conversations about managing deliverables and communicating expectations," CMS said in a statement. "These emails do not reflect final decisions made by more senior CMS officials."

Although the delay was not finalized until September, the emails show that technical officials and contractors knew in July and August they were unlikely to meet the deadline for an Oct. 1 launch.

"As the paper trail broadens, we see more and more evidence that the administration was fully aware its signature health care law was not ready for prime time," Energy and Commerce Chairman Fred Upton, R-Mich., said in a statement. "The documents we are now reviewing tell a much, much different story than what officials testified to Congress."

Officials from CMS and CGI, the lead contractor already under fire for its work building HealthCare.gov, scrambled in July and August to figure out whether they would be able to launch the SHOP exchange on time.

"I've escalated your concerns regarding the SHOP Employee application not being completed until 10/15/13, and the concern that the Employer application development will not be completed until 8/30/13; whereby the Employer will be able to enter the application, get eligibility, shop for a plan, but cannot move through the entire application process because the Employee Application Development will not be completed until 10/15/13," CMS' Jo-Ann Webber wrote in a July 26 email.

Another CMS official noted in response that Chiquita Brooks-Lasure, the policy director for the office implementing most of the Affordable Care Act, had testified the day before that the SHOP exchange would be ready.

CMS officials and CGI ultimately decided on a schedule that had the SHOP exchange opening to employers on Nov. 1—one month late—and then to employees on Nov. 15.

"Can we sign this in blood?" asked Henry Chao, the CMS information officer who handled much of the implementation effort.

"Whose?" CGI replied.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.