On Shutdown Day, Employees Must Still Show Up

U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew Kostas Tsironis/AP

Though federal employees are doubtless following the unfolding congressional drama that might close the government on Tuesday, the law requires them to report for duty even though it may be clear after midnight Monday that a lapse in appropriations had kicked in.

“They have to show up to shut down, to close things down that day,” said Max Stier, president and CEO of the nonprofit Partnership for Public Service. “This is one of the insane aspects of this, not only in the intense amount of time it takes to prepare, but then they have to lock everything down that hadn’t been deemed essential. It not only absorbs a fair amount of energy, it then must start it up again. The waste involved is extraordinary.”

Agency-by-agency guidance on shutdown procedures has been assembled by the Office of Management and Budget, which would be required to issue the shutdown directive soon after midnight if Congress fails to enact an extension of current appropriations.

Such a directive was anticipated in a memorandum by then-Budget Director Jack Lew on the eve of the just-averted shutdown in April 2011.

“An agency shall have its non-excepted employees perform -- for up to a half-day (e.g., up to four hours) --such ‘orderly shutdown’ activities as are needed for the agency's implementation of its contingency plan (e.g., turning in equipment if required),” Lew wrote. “Non-excepted employees who are scheduled to telework on their next scheduled work day may perform these shutdown activities from their telework location, if an existing telework agreement is in place. In addition, agencies at their discretion may allow other employees to conduct shutdown activities from a remote location, even without an existing telework agreement, if the nature of the employees’ shutdown activities are de minimis (i.e., can be accomplished in approximately 15 minutes).”

Such activities would involve receiving an electronic furlough notice and setting e-mail and voice mail responses to reflect an employee’s furlough status, Lew wrote.

The Office of Personnel Management this month issued its own furlough guidance, noting that in such situations, while written notice (including via email) is preferable, “any reasonable notice (e.g., telephonic, oral, personal email, or by mail promptly after the furlough) is permissible.”

A sample notice provided by the agency included language noting that the usual 30-day advance notice was not possible. OPM said notices must factor in collective bargaining agreements and include descriptions of appeal and grievance rights. They also should explain that those employees deemed excepted from furloughs were classified as such under 1981 OMB legal guidance.

For Senior Executive Service members, notices should provide “the reason for the furlough; the expected duration of the furlough and the effective dates; the basis for selecting the appointee when some but not all SES appointees in a given organizational unit are being furloughed; [and] the location where the appointee may inspect the regulations and records pertinent to the action.”

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.