Michelle Obama Receives Blowback ... Over Water

Frank Franklin II/AP

Yes, the headline on this article could have made a "Watergate" pun. But we're feeling restrained.

Michelle Obama on Thursday kicked off the latest in her series of healthy-living initiatives. It's real simple: She wants Americans to drink one more glass of water a day. That's it. Seems reasonable, right?

"Drink just one more glass of water a day and you can make a real difference for your health, your energy, and the way you feel," reads a statement from the first lady.

If that sounds a bit like an infomercial pitch—it might be. Several health experts and writers were saying Thursday that the claim isn't built on much hard science.

From Politico:

"There really isn't data to support this," said Dr. Stanley Goldfarb of the University of Pennsylvania. "I think, unfortunately, frankly, they're not basing this on really hard science. It's not a very scientific approach they've taken.… To make it a major public health effort, I think I would say it's bizarre."

Here's the problem, as The Atlantic's health editor James Hamblin (an M.D.) points out: There is no daily recommended intake for water. A study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention finds that while four cups of water is a moderate amount, "individual water intake needs vary wldely." And the Mayo Clinic's recommendation is more qualitative than quantitative: drink enough water so you don't feel thirsty and your pee doesn't fluoresce.

It could be that the first lady is shying away from a campaign that explicitly tells people to drink less sugary drinks and replace that Pepsi with a water (as it's been proven controversial to both insult an industry and tell people what not to do). But perhaps the initiative wouldn't provoke as much skepticism if the White House did a better job providing a compelling scientific reason as to why more water is better.

Hamblin relates this exchange between a reporter and White House chef and first lady collaborator Sam Kass.

One of my colleagues asked the question that was on my tongue: What are the health benefits you refer to?

Kass replied, "I think the science and evidence about hydration abounds. Starting with headaches, it leads to many more conditions. But this isn't a public health campaign. We think that being positive is most important, not getting into all the details about what a glass of water can do for you, is the message."

To be fair, Kass is a chef, not a scientist, and that was off the cuff. But if you're a national policy adviser on nutrition, and launching a campaign whose singular objective is to tell 314 million people to drink more water, your cuff should have some data that says more water is better.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.