OMB Warns Agencies Not to Be Short-Sighted About Sequestration

Danny Werfel, Controller, Offiice of Management and Budget Danny Werfel, Controller, Offiice of Management and Budget Liz Lynch

This story has been updated. 

The White House on Thursday gave agencies newly detailed guidance on coping with uniform budget cuts under sequestration, elaborating on earlier memos to address opportunities to reprogram funds, honor the independence of inspectors general and determine whether employee bonuses in these lean times are legally necessary.

Controller Danny Werfel, in an April 4 memo to all agency heads, reiterated the Obama administration’s plea to Congress to negotiate a new budget deal that would cancel the dreaded across-the-board cuts that took effect on March 1. “To minimize the negative impact of sequestration on core mission priorities,” Werfel wrote, “agencies must consider the long-term mission, goals and operations of the agency and not just short-term needs. For example, agencies should avoid taking steps that would unduly compromise the ability to perform needed deferred maintenance on facilities, invest in critical operational functions and support, conduct program integrity and fraud mitigation activities, and pursue information technology or other infrastructure investments that are essential.”

Agencies that enjoy carry-over balances or reserve funds should not “use these funds in a manner that would leave the agency vulnerable to future risks due to a potential lack of available funds in future years,” he said, citing several recent memos from the Office of Management and Budget. He encouraged further consultation with the budget office.

Though agency heads have ultimate discretion on how the cuts of roughly 5 percent are applied, all “should be mindful of the independence of the Office of Inspector General and should consult with the IG on a pre-decisional basis on matters that may impact IG funding,” the memo said. In cases where IG funds are not intermingled with other agency funds, the IG should be provided “full discretion.”

Werfel strengthened a February directive discouraging cash bonuses for employees, saying “agencies should not issue such monetary awards from sequestered accounts unless agency counsel determines the awards are legally required.” Examples of permissible awards include quality step increases; travel incentives recognizing employee savings during official travel; mission-critical foreign-language awards; incentives for recruitment, retention and relocation; student loan repayments and time-off awards. “While these items are permitted,” the memo said, “in light of current budgetary constraints, they should be used only on a highly limited basis and in circumstances where they are necessary and critical to maintaining the agency's mission.”

OMB directed managers to consult with employee organizations on the implications for collective bargaining agreements.

The Senior Executives Association took issue with OMB's characterization of which bonuses are legally required, and asked the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel to issue an opinion on whether Senior Executive Service performance awards are mandated by law.  

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.